Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,317

0 members and 3,317 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,096
Threads: 248,539
Posts: 2,568,740
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, eamorris97
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    BPnet Senior Member JodanOrNoDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-23-2015
    Location
    Everglades
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks
    2,017
    Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,575 Posts
    Images: 77

    Deformation rates

    For those that have hatched enough eggs to begin having usable stats, let's say 50+. What has been your rate of non-viable deformation in eggs that have gone full term? These numbers should not include incubator accidents or known genetically risky breedings (spider x spider) etc.

    My numbers are sitting at 1 in 70 where the animal needs to be euthanized on hatching. My rate is the same at this point whether it is a closely related breeding or a totally unrelated one. Typical deformations seem to be severe kinking or underdeveloped lower jaw. In every case I have had so far, the deformation has not been repeated with the same breeding and it has always been a single normal looking egg of a larger clutch (8 or more).

    My latest problem was this weekend, very nice clutch of 9 large eggs with another "world's first" inside. Mother and father are solid breeders and the pairing has been done before. Eggs piped Friday, right on schedule. I cut and everything seemed normal. 8 of the 9 had heads hanging out within a couple hours. The next day 4 were out of the egg but one still had not come up for air. As is normal for me, I prodded the rest of them out of the egg. I had to remove #9. It was alive but so severely kinked it could not unwrap itself. I chased my kids of the room before they noticed and did what needed to be done.

    Any data anyone else has gathered would be helpful.

    Thanks
    Honest, I only need one more ...

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to JodanOrNoDan For This Useful Post:

    Craiga 01453 (07-16-2018)

  3. #2
    BPnet Senior Member StillBP's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-13-2015
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    1,541
    Thanks
    464
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 657 Posts

    Re: Deformation rates

    I've hatched several hundred Eggs. And have lost a few babies due to circumstances but not hatched anything deformed yet.

    Sent from my XT1635-01 using Tapatalk
    Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to StillBP For This Useful Post:

    JodanOrNoDan (07-16-2018)

  5. #3
    BPnet Senior Member JodanOrNoDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-23-2015
    Location
    Everglades
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks
    2,017
    Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,575 Posts
    Images: 77

    Re: Deformation rates

    Quote Originally Posted by StillBP View Post
    I've hatched several hundred Eggs. And have lost a few babies due to circumstances but not hatched anything deformed yet.

    Sent from my XT1635-01 using Tapatalk
    Thanks, what temps are you incubating at? I am usually low 87-88. Most likely coincidental, but the only thing the deformed animals have had in common were that they were 3-5 gene animals. I have never had a problem with a normal or single gene.
    Honest, I only need one more ...

  6. #4
    BPnet Senior Member StillBP's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-13-2015
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    1,541
    Thanks
    464
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 657 Posts

    Re: Deformation rates

    Quote Originally Posted by JodanOrNoDan View Post
    Thanks, what temps are you incubating at? I am usually low 87-88. Most likely coincidental, but the only thing the deformed animals have had in common were that they were 3-5 gene animals. I have never had a problem with a normal or single gene.
    88.9° exactly. I've hatched a few 3-5 gene. But I generally try for 3 at most. Alot of the 5 gene animals don't look as nice as a 3 gene

    Sent from my XT1635-01 using Tapatalk
    Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired.

  7. #5
    BPnet Senior Member JodanOrNoDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-23-2015
    Location
    Everglades
    Posts
    3,042
    Thanks
    2,017
    Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,575 Posts
    Images: 77

    Re: Deformation rates

    Quote Originally Posted by StillBP View Post
    88.9° exactly. I've hatched a few 3-5 gene. But I generally try for 3 at most. Alot of the 5 gene animals don't look as nice as a 3 gene

    Sent from my XT1635-01 using Tapatalk
    Yeah, I agree. I think I have one animal personal/breeding group that is over three genes and that one I kept because it was a "first". Most of my breeding females are exceptional single gene or super/als animals. At four genes, in most cases you start to get mud. People want the stacked genes though.
    Honest, I only need one more ...

  8. #6
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    647
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 425 Times in 261 Posts
    Images: 21

    Re: Deformation rates

    I've had my share of dead embryos and deformed babies in normal Colubrids. I've never bred ball pythons. Worst I remember was a stillborn bullsnake that had the two halves of a loop fused together belly to belly. I've also seen tiny, deformed lower jaws in a litter of timber rattlesnakes. Small/missing eye on one or both sides have turned up in a variety of species. Worst of all was the loss of my Burmese python and her entire clutch. Probable cause was vitamin A deficiency. I don't recall any kinks in my babies, but I think vitamin deficiencies many be implicated in a lot of that sort of problem and in bugeyed babies.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1