Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,331

2 members and 3,329 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,097
Threads: 248,539
Posts: 2,568,745
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Travism91
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Don't Push My Buttons JLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-28-2004
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    31,651
    Thanks
    3,195
    Thanked 7,199 Times in 3,028 Posts
    Blog Entries
    37
    Images: 304
    I think the "jury" is still out on the full genetic story of spiders. Kara (KLG) mentioned that some dominants may have a "super" form that isn't visible, but didn't mention spiders in her example...and I think NERD knows more about spiders than just about anyone. I may have missed it, but I haven't yet read of anyone producing a for-sure "Super-Spider", visible or not.

    (And I would LOVE it if Kara or Randy Remington stepped in here to fill us in on the real spidey story!)
    -- Judy

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28
    I can just speculate on the possibilities (co-dominant with an as yet unseen super, dominant with a yet unproved super, co-dominant with a lethal super).

    Kara has the hands on experience and breeding data to make the best guess as to which one of these (or something I haven’t thought of) it is.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1