» Site Navigation
0 members and 3,214 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,097
Threads: 248,541
Posts: 2,568,760
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
I love all the 'experts' in here telling this guy what his snake is.
Especially people talking about the importance of being forum 'veterans'. Can't be an expert without your internet ten-year.
Hope it proves to be something cool. If not, great looking snake anyways.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Soterios For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by Soterios
I love all the 'experts' in here telling this guy what his snake is.
No one has said his snake and it's off spring aren't cool. But, he came on here and presented a Pastel Black Back as a new morph, which it clearly is not, and then got Signal 20 uptight when that fact was pointed out to him.
If you put onions on my hamburger and tell me it's cheese, I do not have to be an 'expert' to tell you it's wrong.
Thomas "Slim" Whitman
Never Met A Ball Python I Didn't Like
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Slim For This Useful Post:
heathers*bps (05-13-2012),luvmyballs (05-15-2012),Rob (05-14-2012)
-
____JOSHUA____
___ ___
ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK GO KU!!
Kansas City Chiefs
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerhart For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by Jerhart
"ten-year."
Can't help that I didn't notice an auto correct for the word tenure.
-
-
The fact that you got a snake off of cl and proved it out to be genetic without knowing what it is is aeesome, congrats. But that doesny change the fact that it looks like a million (sarcastly) other pastels we've seen, with or without the BB. Ftom the pictures you have shown of the one clutch you have prodiced, the "BB" and the "pastel", obviously arent genetic together, and you just got lucky with the odds gods. With that being said, until we see something that doesnt look exactly like a ton of other snakes that we know exactly what they are, alot of peoples minds wont change from the black back pastel idea.
Whether or not were right, congrats on some nice looking babies. I personally wouldnt mind having the 4th one pictured in the first set of hatchling pics.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by interloc
Good sleuthing Sherlock! I would say that you may be on to something there. That raises another question for me tho. Does that mean another "het" have a marker? A black back could be het genetic stripe? I love these questions. It's what keeps the whole hobby so interesting.
Sent from my poo fone using Tapatalk
amen to that!! research, research never ends but makes you just a bit more interested. that would be nice to of have stumbled across a genetic black back het g-stripe without knowing it.
found this on the web if interested.
http://www.australianaddiction.com/BallGS.html
-
-
Registered User
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by Soterios
I love all the 'experts' in here telling this guy what his snake is.
thank you, you hit the nail on the head with that statement, the snake was purchased without knowing what it might be, regardless of what it looks like. i put the time, effort and money into proving what it was. like countless of other people who take on dinkerer's ( just made that word up also by the way) hope to do. to me until proven other wise, by me it is a new morph even if its just in my camp.
the point of the original post was for some constructive input, not for the "experts" to rip my snake or me apart with comments like, low grade pastel etc..ect.., so of course im gonna go on the defensive!
it doesn't matter what it is, they are nice snakes an will produce and if it is the new holy grail hopefully the haters have 10 grand to spend, if not it keeps me entertained lol..
"conforming to the views of the masses makes you a follower, thinking outside the box makes you an innovator." ( and made that up also)
-
-
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by HCC MORPHS
thank you, you hit the nail on the head with that statement, the snake was purchased without knowing what it might be, regardless of what it looks like. i put the time, effort and money into proving what it was. like countless of other people who take on dinkerer's ( just made that word up also by the way) hope to do. to me until proven other wise, by me it is a new morph even if its just in my camp.
the point of the original post was for some constructive input, not for the "experts" to rip my snake or me apart with comments like, low grade pastel etc..ect.., so of course im gonna go on the defensive!
it doesn't matter what it is, they are nice snakes an will produce and if it is the new holy grail hopefully the haters have 10 grand to spend, if not it keeps me entertained lol..
"conforming to the views of the masses makes you a follower, thinking outside the box makes you an innovator." ( and made that up also)
Pure gold in this one.
____JOSHUA____
___ ___
ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK GO KU!!
Kansas City Chiefs
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jerhart For This Useful Post:
Christopher De Leon (05-13-2012),Slim (05-13-2012)
-
Registered User
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by cmack91
I personally wouldnt mind having the 4th one pictured in the first set of hatchling pics.
the 4th (bottom) one is a normal =)
-
-
05-13-2012, 11:48 PM
#100
Re: Beginings of a new morph.
Originally Posted by HCC MORPHS
the 4th (bottom) one is a normal =)
Maybe I miss cointed, the fifth pic down.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|