Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,216

0 members and 3,216 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,095
Threads: 248,538
Posts: 2,568,726
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Daisyg
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-01-2011
    Posts
    65
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts

    Finally up and running!

    Finally got my stuff together. I'm currently running the thermostat and heat pad in the empty enclosure just to test the probe/thermometers, etc and get a feel for where I need to set things.

    The thermostat is a herpstat. I currently have it set to 87.0F. The probe reads 87.1F and seems to spend a lot of time at 0% and coming on a little bit to warm it about 0.4F above 87.0...

    The thermometer reads 85.5F

    Temp gun reads 86.1F

    The thermostat probe is glue-gunned very securely inside the enclosure (I did read into thermostat placement, risks, and reasons... This wasn't a 'didn't know better' decision. There will be a backup outside of the enclosure, and the probe inside the enclosure was secured as if it was my own face that was going to be lying on it).

    So I understand that there's going to be some variance between temperature readings from different probes on different equipment, so do I trust the herpstat probe more than the temp gun?

    The enclosure is not set up as it will be (no substrate, hides, etc). I'm just trying to get a feel for my equipment with an arbitrary temperature, first.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-01-2011
    Posts
    65
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts

    Re: Finally up and running!

    Sort of answered my own question... + -1.8F margin of error on the temp gun, would put it about 0.1F below the herpstat, which I think correlates to the herpstat's margin of error perfectly if my memory is accurate.

    Wont let me edit original post?

  3. #3
    BPnet Senior Member spitzu's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-14-2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,421
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 427 Times in 319 Posts
    Images: 30
    It's great that you're putting so much thought and effort into this, but I'm confused. What's the point of having your main tstat probe inside the enclosure and your backup outside of the enclosure?
    Last edited by spitzu; 03-23-2012 at 02:27 AM.
    Rocky Mountain Balls
    Website
    Facebook

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-01-2011
    Posts
    65
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts

    Re: Finally up and running!

    The place I live in is not the most temperature-stable environment (it's not cold or anything though), and gets quite a bit of sunlight through parts of the day.

    When the thermostat is on the outside, it works on a ratio premise (ie. when the thermostat is at 96, the enclosure should be at 90), but that seems to be only so effective when the ambient room temperature fluctuates, and unintended heat sources may be present during parts of the day.

    So, for me, it seemed more reliable to have the probe inside, taking the reading from where it actually mattered. A cheaper back-up probe on the outside just means that even if the snake did somehow manage to dislodge the probe, at least the heat pad will only get so hot.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Wiggy For This Useful Post:

    spitzu (03-23-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1