Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,032

1 members and 3,031 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,124
Threads: 248,567
Posts: 2,568,945
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Rai
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    BPnet Senior Member cmack91's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-2011
    Location
    Pierce County, WA
    Posts
    1,917
    Thanks
    647
    Thanked 440 Times in 369 Posts

    question about recessive morphs

    lets say i have an albino male, and breed him to a normal female. is there any difference (except odds) in breeding a poss. het to the albino vs. a poss. het to poss. het?
    ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

  2. #2
    Registered User benwallage9's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-17-2011
    Location
    Monmouth, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    261
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
    Other then odds? If I get what your saying not really. However if you breed a albino to a normal all the babies will be 100% het albino.

    A poss. het, which are usually 66% or 50% het, means they only have a 66% or 50% chance of being a het albino. So if you bred the albino to a poss. het and that poss. het proved out to be a 100% het, you would have half albinos and half 100% het albino. However, if the poss het turned out to not be a het at all it would be just like breeding to a normal, all the babies would be 100% het albino, and the poss het would then be considered a normal.

    The idea situation for you would be to have a male albino and two poss. het females. That way you could breed the male albino to the poss. hets to prove the hets out.

    I hope this answers your questions and good luck
    Youtube channel:

    http://www.youtube.com/user/flyfishben?feature=mhee

    My Collection:
    0.1 2009 pastel
    1.0 2010 spider
    0.1 2010 pinstripe
    0.1 2011 pastel
    1.0 2011 mojave
    0.1 2011 cinnamon
    0.0.1 2009 normal corn snake
    0.1 100% het anery 66% het snow boa

  3. #3
    Registered User benwallage9's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-17-2011
    Location
    Monmouth, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    261
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
    also het just means that the animal carries the gene albino but the gene isn't visible.
    Youtube channel:

    http://www.youtube.com/user/flyfishben?feature=mhee

    My Collection:
    0.1 2009 pastel
    1.0 2010 spider
    0.1 2010 pinstripe
    0.1 2011 pastel
    1.0 2011 mojave
    0.1 2011 cinnamon
    0.0.1 2009 normal corn snake
    0.1 100% het anery 66% het snow boa

  4. #4
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-12-2011
    Location
    Bay area, CA
    Posts
    542
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 35 Times in 32 Posts
    Any recessive to a normal, the outcome is going to be a 100% het for that morph. Meaning its a normal ball python but carries the recessive morph gene.

    Possible hets are either 66% or 50% het. These happen when you breed 100% to 100% or 100% to a normal. The 100 to 100 are 66% the 100 to normal is 50. The 66 and 50 hets mean the percentage of that animal carrying the recessive gene. When breeding poss hets its always a gamble.

    The difference is that if you breed an albino to a poss het, the guaranteed outcome is that all of the babies will be 100% yet. IF you produce some visual albinos than you just proved that your possible het snake is actually a 100% het albino. When breeding a 100% to a visual the chances of each egg are 50% albino 50% normal het albinos.

    Possible het to a possible het is a gamble. If you produce an albino than the two are actually 100% het albinos. But if you produce all normals than you have just normals and one of the two or both snakes are not het for albino. OR you just missed the odds of getting a visual albino.

  5. #5
    BPnet Senior Member cmack91's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-2011
    Location
    Pierce County, WA
    Posts
    1,917
    Thanks
    647
    Thanked 440 Times in 369 Posts

    Re: question about recessive morphs

    i was more wondering if there is a difference when breeding parent to child VS. child to child, is there one that has more chance for deformity or complications, or does it not matter. sorry, i should have worded the original question differently
    ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

  6. #6
    Registered User benwallage9's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-17-2011
    Location
    Monmouth, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    261
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
    From what I hear either way is ok as long as you don't continually do it.
    Youtube channel:

    http://www.youtube.com/user/flyfishben?feature=mhee

    My Collection:
    0.1 2009 pastel
    1.0 2010 spider
    0.1 2010 pinstripe
    0.1 2011 pastel
    1.0 2011 mojave
    0.1 2011 cinnamon
    0.0.1 2009 normal corn snake
    0.1 100% het anery 66% het snow boa

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to benwallage9 For This Useful Post:

    cmack91 (10-14-2011)

  8. #7
    BPnet Senior Member cmack91's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-2011
    Location
    Pierce County, WA
    Posts
    1,917
    Thanks
    647
    Thanked 440 Times in 369 Posts

    Re: question about recessive morphs

    okay thankyou
    ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1