» Site Navigation
3 members and 3,400 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,096
Threads: 248,539
Posts: 2,568,740
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Originally Posted by Adam_Wysocki
To put it simply, Politicians deciding our future is bad ... USFWS conducting a process designed to equally consider all factors and incorporate external input is good.
-adam
While I don't want to see anything banned, I will take, at least a partial, fair chance from USFWS over a political railroading any day. This definitely is not a won battle. This is just the momentum picking up on our side
"Cry, Havoc! And let slip the dogs of war..."
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Originally Posted by jsschrei
I did not see this as a favorable press release.
I think that is probably because you're not familiar with the regulatory processes for listing injurious species.
The USFWS service is going to do what they should have been doing all alone. The USFWS rule process allows for far more solutions to be offered than just a out right ban on import or interstate transport. Other regulatory options will be on the table if one or more of the nine species is found to be injurious. Also, the findings of the USGS risk assessment will be debated among scientists instead of politicians.
PIJAC and USARK both see this as extremely favorable and I hope that you will too. This is not a win by any means, but it's the best news we've had in a while.
-adam
Click Below to Fight The National Python & Boa Ban
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
- Anna Sewell, author of Black Beauty
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Adam_Wysocki For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
I hope you are right. Actually, I pray for that.
I would love to see scientific process taken seriously by the government.
Hoping for the best......
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Okay, I get it now.
Hmm, don't know if I'd call this "good," but it's definitely "better." Though, it is very good this is starting to go through the proper channels; hopefully, this will help squash the whole "let's make it easier to ban whatever we want" bill that the FL politicians are working on....
Periodic Table Pythons - Quality, captive-bred pythons? It's elementary!
1.0 VPI Axanthic, 1.0 Genetic Stripe, 1.0 Red Axanthic, 1.0 Lesser Platinum, 1.0 50% Het Albino, 0.1 Albino, 0.1 Het VPI Axanthic, 0.1 Het Red Axanthic, 0.1 Het G-Stripe, 0.1 Woma, 0.1 Mojave, 0.1 Normal.
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Originally Posted by Adam_Wysocki
The USFWS service is going to do what they should have been doing all alone. The USFWS rule process allows for far more solutions to be offered than just a out right ban on import or interstate transport. Other regulatory options will be on the table if one or more of the nine species is found to be injurious. Also, the findings of the USGS risk assessment will be debated among scientists instead of politicians.
I have a question about the USGS Risk Assessment debate. Will the scientists debating the assessment be chosen to debate it, or is it more of a volunteer thing? Because there are good ones and there are bad ones.
I do see this as a great step in the right direction, and it does make me hopeful for our future, however I can't help but wonder if there is an unforeseen loop hole that can screw us over.
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Originally Posted by Jyson
Will the scientists debating the assessment be chosen to debate it, or is it more of a volunteer thing?
The USFWS will have to consider scientific input from PIJAC, USARK, and others that refutes the findings of the USGS risk assessment. The scientists will be on our side, and they will be among the best in the world.
-adam
Click Below to Fight The National Python & Boa Ban
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
- Anna Sewell, author of Black Beauty
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Adam_Wysocki For This Useful Post:
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Thank you Adam, for clarifying this. Some days I am not very smart.
I agree that this is not a win, yet, but at least a step in the right direction.
For once I am on the side of science.
1.1 CRT Boa -Anery 100% Het Snow . , Salmon 66% P. Het Snow
3.5 Normal BP Some are P. Het for Axanthic, and Snow
1.1 Mojave BP
1.0 Spider BP
0.1 Pastel BP
2.0 Fire BP
1.0 Ghost
0.1 Possible Axanthic
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
this is slightly good, but it still keeps the process within crooked hands.
just who do you think put salazar into place
Last edited by nixer; 01-22-2010 at 09:09 AM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|