Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 691

0 members and 691 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,194
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
  • 07-16-2009, 08:46 PM
    Watever
    Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Does any one have a picture of a normal woma-lesser ?

    Not the ones NERD produced with the hidden-gene but the ones without it.

    Does it look like a lesser bee ? Or it's a bit different ?

    Thank you :)

    And does anyone have any idea if the lesser pearl NERD hatched in 2006 survived ? Cause we never heard of, so I would assume not, but well we never know, since he keep stuff secret :D

    Thank you guys (and girls)
  • 07-16-2009, 08:49 PM
    rabernet
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Watever View Post
    Does any one have a picture of a normal woma-lesser ?

    Not the ones NERD produced with the hidden-gene but the ones without it.

    Does it look like a lesser bee ? Or it's a bit different ?

    Thank you :)

    And does anyone have any idea if the lesser pearl NERD hatched in 2006 survived ? Cause we never heard of, so I would assume not, but well we never know, since he keep stuff secret :D

    Thank you guys (and girls)

    Kevin has stated that the Pearl appears to be a lethal combination, he's not had any survive. I've not seen any adult Pearls the two times I've spent a week there, with full access to their collection, so I don't believe he's keeping that secret.

    I am not sure I've seen a picture of a lesser/woma (no hidden gene) combo.
  • 07-16-2009, 09:28 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rabernet View Post
    Kevin has stated that the Pearl appears to be a lethal combination, he's not had any survive. I've not seen any adult Pearls the two times I've spent a week there, with full access to their collection, so I don't believe he's keeping that secret.

    I am not sure I've seen a picture of a lesser/woma (no hidden gene) combo.

    Thank you :)

    I tought the exact same thing, no pearl survived yet. But I also heard that with other combination, they could survive, but I have never seen any of those, other than the baby lesser pearl from 2006 I think.
  • 07-17-2009, 08:29 AM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Watever View Post
    Does any one have a picture of a normal woma-lesser ?

    Not the ones NERD produced with the hidden-gene but the ones without it.

    Does it look like a lesser bee ? Or it's a bit different ?

    http://photos.imageevent.com/corners...amacallit1.jpg
  • 07-17-2009, 08:54 AM
    DarkComeSoon
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    wow thats beautiful
  • 07-17-2009, 09:18 AM
    asplundii
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    I am sorry to question you Louis but I do not see any of the indicators that I come to associate with Woma in that animal (head patch, moustache, light eye...) Are you cetain on the ID?
  • 07-17-2009, 10:38 AM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Thank you very much Louis !!!

    asplundii : There is lot of variation in the woma, like in the spider. With the funky pattern, I think it's one. Remember that lesser will modify the pattern also etc... :)
  • 07-17-2009, 10:47 AM
    asplundii
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Wat: Yeah I know Woma have a lot of variation

    http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r...P6230016_2.jpg

    But some of the things are kind of diffinative to the morph... things I would look for in determining a combo. I know Lesser will modify the pattern but I would not expect it to erase all of the traits I have come to associate with a Woma...

    Also, I am not trying to say that that animal is not the combo. I am just saying that I do not see it. If Louis can tell me what identifiers he is using I might very well be able to see the combo nature... as it is though that just looks like a really nice Lesser to me
  • 07-17-2009, 11:31 AM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    I am sorry to question you Louis but I do not see any of the indicators that I come to associate with Woma in that animal (head patch, moustache, light eye...) Are you cetain on the ID?

    He was produced by Ballistic Morphs. Here's a pic of his mom that Debbie sent me when I purchased him.

    http://photos.imageevent.com/corners...Womalesser.jpg
  • 07-17-2009, 11:43 AM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    ... as it is though that just looks like a really nice Lesser to me

    When you see him in person (in snake?) he looks very different from any of the Lessers we have. The pattern is different as are the colors. It's hard to capture his true colors in a photograph. I know because I've tried several times without success. :(

    While I'm posting pics, here is one Debbie sent me of his daddy.

    http://photos.imageevent.com/corners...Womalesser.jpg
  • 07-17-2009, 11:44 AM
    ItsMichael805
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    wow thats a cool snake!
  • 07-17-2009, 11:55 AM
    asplundii
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Hey Louis,

    Thanks for the background... I am still not seeing it but maybe it is just the pics ???


    Is dad a Lesser/Pastel?
  • 07-17-2009, 12:02 PM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    Hey Louis,

    Thanks for the background... I am still not seeing it but maybe it is just the pics ???


    Is dad a Lesser/Pastel?

    Hopefully he will start earning his keep this fall and we can prove him out, although I have no doubt that he is a Woma Lesser.

    I was told by Debbie that dad is a Pastel Lesser.
  • 07-17-2009, 12:16 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    The name of the picture says Pastel Lesser for the dad !

    Well, good luck on it :)
    I will consider this cross next year may.
  • 07-17-2009, 12:31 PM
    asplundii
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Watever View Post
    The name of the picture says Pastel Lesser for the dad !

    Yeah well... I did not feel like checking that LOL cause my experience is that pics are usually labeled things like PQC3_110904_4 or something like that.

    @ Louis,

    I am not saying he is not :) Just saying that from the pic I do not see it, probably just cause of the nature of the pic, like you said. Could also be that it is a stand alone pic and if he were side by side with a regular Lesser I would see the difference. :confuzd: Still and all it is a great looking animal
  • 07-17-2009, 02:14 PM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    That's not a woma-lesser. Woma-lessers have a light dorsal stripe, they look nothing like Womas, and only a bit like lessers.
    That appears to be a lesser, or a pastel-lesser.

    This is a woma-lesser: http://www.newenglandreptile.com/ner...s.womless1.jpg

    As you can see, there's no mistaking it.

    I'm sure it was a lesser from a womaXlesser clutch--I just produced one of those myself--but it's not a carrier of the woma gene.
  • 07-17-2009, 02:25 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post

    On another forum, someone from NERD told me that this pictures is a Woma-Lesser + Hidden Gene.

    Do you have a picture of the one you just hatched ? May be he have the hidden-gene ???
  • 07-17-2009, 02:30 PM
    mainbutter
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post
    That's not a woma-lesser. Woma-lessers have a light dorsal stripe, they look nothing like Womas, and only a bit like lessers.

    Only from the hidden gene womas crossed with lessers.
  • 07-17-2009, 02:32 PM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Hmm...you may be right. This one from Daytona is labeled as being a woma-lesser:
    http://www.ballpythonmorphs.com/daytona06/bhb20.jpg

    You can see the woma striping in its pattern.

    This is my hatchling, clearly just a lesser:
    http://eclipseexotics.wingedwolfpsio...LessMale-2.jpg

    NERD should label its photos more specifically, lol.
  • 07-17-2009, 02:53 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post
    Hmm...you may be right. This one from Daytona is labeled as being a woma-lesser:
    http://www.ballpythonmorphs.com/daytona06/bhb20.jpg

    You can see the woma striping in its pattern.

    This is my hatchling, clearly just a lesser:
    http://eclipseexotics.wingedwolfpsio...LessMale-2.jpg

    NERD should label its photos more specifically, lol.

    The animal from the first link looks like the one show here.

    As for your lesser, I tought you said it was a woma-lesser with a stripe that you hatched and it wasn't with the hidden-gene :)

    But thank you for that first picture. I was looking for those, and couldn't find any hehe :)
  • 07-17-2009, 03:07 PM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Nope, re-read. Just a lesser from a woma-lesser clutch. But 3 noses are still sticking out of eggs, so I'm still hoping! ^_^
  • 07-17-2009, 10:50 PM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
  • 07-17-2009, 10:56 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Is that a woma-lesser ?

    well, it doesn't look like the other one, and have some nice pattern.
    May be it will be easier to see when he shed and grow a little more.
  • 07-17-2009, 11:17 PM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Definitely is--he is incredible. He's so PALE, I only see faint yellow on him.
  • 07-18-2009, 10:13 AM
    Brock Wagner
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    I hatched one out that looks just like that. He is very brown and not very stunning looking. I think that the plain old Lesser Woma cross is not that exciting. Just me though.

    Brock
  • 07-22-2009, 08:14 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    To come back on this ! I was watching BHB video on youtube the last days

    And I don't remember in wich ones, but we see a woma lesser in it. And it's georgeous Not the most special one, but quite nice. There is one as a baby, and the other time we see it is when he show the breeding for 09. So I wonder what he gonna get
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1