Pied Markers

I've seen many threads like "OMG look at that belly and those markers", but no one ever explains what these "markers" are. I know markers are not 100% correct so stay away from that argument.

I would just like to know what these markers are even if pictures are available it would help.

Thank you.

Check this out.

http://www.ball-pythons.net/forums/s...t+pied+markers

Awesome great link. This is overall what I was looking for.

"The "marker traits" are a clean belly with a thick, dark border on both sides."

Knowing that and what they look like I believe less in these markers. Thanks Ed.

No prob. I only have a couple of het pieds one has the marks one don't so I'm not sure where to stand on the issue

Looking at my normal, he has markings too. I'll never try to prove him out though.

I am kind of in line with what Adam was saying, that the markings are more of just random patterning.

some people are hard core believers but the fact that proven non hets have the markers tells you its unreliable

I wouldn't live or die by the markers but if I was looking at possible het pieds I would prefer to pick one with the marker. But like many have said they don't all have markers and some do that aren't het pied.

Interestingly. Last year I bred my Het Pied male (which does NOT have the markers) to a normal female (which also did NOT have the markers) And I ended up with 50% possible het babies where some of them DID have the markers. So, it's kind of odd the way it works, its not a sure fire thing, but it can't be completely dismissed either.

Mark

I have Het Pieds that have the markers, and some that don't.

It's kinda luck of the draw?

Both of my male het's have the markers, while my female does not.

I'm trying to remember when the het pied indicator idea first broke on kingsnake. I know it was before summer 2003. And we still don't agree on it!

I have since heard of a case where an imported female with the indicator belly was bred back to a son with the same belly and produced pied. This was a little ironic as I believe the owner was one of the people who didn’t think the marker was useful but noticed the different looking line and inbred it without expecting pied. Still, I wouldn't think it would be accurate enough to regularly pick het pieds out of the wild but I do have a probably wild caught female I’m trying it with just in case.

I'm using a male that was given to me as a 25% chance het pied (the son of a then unproven 50% chance het pied). My male is now actually upgraded from a 25% chance het pied to a 50% chance het pied as his sister proved het pied (indicating his father hit his 50% chance). His markers are pretty extreme and I personally have little doubt that he is a het but am less sure about the females I have big enough to breed him to this year.

Thanks for the report of the results of getting belly striped possible hets from a pair of non belly striped adults. I wonder if this could be something like the spinning in spiders that seems to be directly tied to the mutation it's self but there is some random chance or some unknown environmental factor that contributes to whether or not it's seen. Some report that not all spiders spin and that a non spinning spider can produce spinning offspring and vice versa. Perhaps het pieds have a strong tendency to develop the thick wide lines on the edge of a wide white belly but incubation conditions must be right to produce it so sometimes you get the normal bellied hets. Or maybe the expression is based on other genetics in the animal. It looks like lesser is a separate gene from piebald but some how the presence of a single lesser mutant copy allows the white in a homozygous pied to spread all over the body. So far there has only been one lesser pied but it was also the first all white pied but it's yet to be confirmed that this will happen consistently (I expect it will though). Maybe some "normal" and common gene allows the het pieds to have the starts of pied bellies and het pieds with a less common version of this other gene don't get the belly.

My great grandma had a big, hooked nose. My grandma ended up with it, so did my dad, and so did I. But my brother didn't... he got my mom's nose.

The markers is like a family trait thing. They're all related, some get the wide stripe, some don't. If my great grandma was het piebald it doesn't mean I am just because I have her nose, nor does it mean my brother isn't because he has a different nose.

Does that make any sense?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandyRemington

I have since heard of a case where an imported female with the indicator belly was bred back to a son with the same belly and produced pied. This was a little ironic as I believe the owner was one of the people who didn’t think the marker was useful but noticed the different looking line and inbred it without expecting pied. Still, I wouldn't think it would be accurate enough to regularly pick het pieds out of the wild but I do have a probably wild caught female I’m trying it with just in case.

---

Are you referring to Justin Kobylka?
http://www.ball-pythons.net/forums/s...ad.php?t=53665

Yes, that appears to be the case. I had read about it on another forum where I thought I remember him saying something about having not really believed in the belly indicator. Even here (I caught up, I must have been out of town when those threads where originally posted) it sounds like he was looking at other slightly unusual traits often seen in het pieds. I was just looking at one of my possible het girls tonight and with both the intricate hooked pattern and the belly I'm feeling good about her but of course will need eventual breeding results to really back it up.