Should We Ban Photobucket?

ugh, Photobucket is the worse! and i think it's time to ban Photobucket from BP.net!

last year, Overnight, PB took all your pix hostage and demanded a ransom of at least $400/year if u want to share YOUR PIX w/ others and on other websites.
https://ball-pythons.net/forums/cach...om/0BMDFSk.png




this ruined millions of websites. this ruined countless threads here on our forum itself. i did a quick check and here are some threads that were ruined by PB.

-- 20gallon long - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...-With-Pictures!

-- hides my way - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...0-Hides-my-way (don't blame Deborah on this one. Blame Photobucket!)

-- how to set up an egg tub - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...-up-an-egg-tub

-- my feeder euthanizer (DIY CO2 Chamber - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...Y-CO2-chamber)

-- DIY Incubator Tutorial - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...bator-Tutorial

-- DIY Large Rack - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...DIY-Large-Rack

-- new rat bin - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...1-New-Rat-Bins

-- light dimmer/rheostat instructions - https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...t-Instructions


lotsa How-To/DIY and pix threads were ruined. i've always pointed fellow forumers esp. the newbies to some of these threads esp. the setups but now they are not as helpful w/o their accompanying pix.




even the peeps who have a paid Photobucket account, they're pix and stuff is still loaded w/ ads and crap. i just clicked on one pix and here is what happened:

it is so laggy.
https://ball-pythons.net/forums/cach...om/KtQ2bIE.png


i think it's so laggy b/c it's loading all the ads, popups and clickbait and stuff. well, one caught my eye and i did click it. big mistake!
https://ball-pythons.net/forums/cach...om/rAAWrEh.png


it downloaded crap and froze my web browser/computer.
https://ball-pythons.net/forums/cach...om/qYwBgdd.png




i think it's time to ban Photobucket. please consider this proposal.

it is really upsetting trying to read older threads and all the photos are broken. i use Imgur.com to upload stuff on my computer and Tapatalk for stuff from my phone.

also, Ax, you should really use an ad blocker! lol.

Ban them....

How rotten to place a ransom on people's picture agree with you a bit too much..:O

Nothing, absolutely nothing is free, nor should it be expected to be. Servers cost money, disk space costs money, traffic costs money, producing software costs money. I don't use services like photobucket because I believe they are deceptive, just like facebook, and hook people into giving them something under the pretext of free. Photobucket fooled a lot of people, but they have to eat as well.

If this site wants to ban one file sharing site, they need to ban them all and only allow images that are hosted here. That is the only thing that will ensure the integrity of the threads.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JodanOrNoDan

Nothing, absolutely nothing is free, nor should it be expected to be. Servers cost money, disk space costs money, traffic costs money, producing software costs money. I don't use services like photobucket because I believe they are deceptive, just like facebook, and hook people into giving them something under the pretext of free. Photobucket fooled a lot of people, but they have to eat as well.

If this site wants to ban one file sharing site, they need to ban them all and only allow images that are hosted here. That is the only thing that will ensure the integrity of the threads.

---

ok i got a free Krispie Kreme donut today, but i think i know what u mean. we shouldn't ban them not b/c they no longer offer a free service (option), but we should ban Photobucket b/c they suck. also they're crooks and incompetent. at least other file sharing/hosting sites have a business model where they offer free and paid hosting options/plans. these sites know how to run a good looking website w/out the clutter of ads, fake clickbait, adware/malware and stuff. moreover they're not abruptly forcing a fee on u and your viewing public for access to your pix. that's just unethical and unfortunately there were many casualties of the PB debacle including countless threads on this forum.

Ax! You should know better than to click on clickbait!
:pc:

Rumours abound that PhotoBucket has relented somewhat and whilst they still offer some premium options you can still use the basic option for FREE ?!

Any info guys ??


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

There is nothing worse than googling an issue, finly finding a wonderful detailed answer on a forum, but ALL the pictures are that stupid Photobucket "please update your account" crap, ruining the answer. Imgur never has those issues, the pics stay there no problem. It happens to me all the time digging through old forum answers here as well as on other forums. Absolutely frustrating!

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Maybe the photos may all reappear now if Photobucket has relented ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zincubus

Maybe the photos may all reappear now if Photobucket has relented ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

---

no, they haven't truly relented. they have new management, a severely downsized workforce and just reduced their price by 95%. peeps get access to the pix again but hosting/sharing starts at $2.49/month subscription. they still seem to be all over the map b/c various peeps report that some pix are working again while others are not. just click on some of the threads i listed. they're still down, but random Photobucket pix seem to be working here and there. their coding must suck.

this is was their Twitter announcement awhile back: https://twitter.com/photobucket/stat...22642924576768

https://ball-pythons.net/forums/cach...om/R8pO3Fd.png

the announcement and that pix they use is hilarious. they don't seem to be getting alotta love jugding from the likes, re-tweets and comments.

anyways here's some articles: https://www.bizjournals.com/denver/n...-millions.html

Quote:

---

Photobucket drops pricing that angered millions (and new CEO hopes to unbreak the internet)

Photobucket’s experiment with being a $399.99 premium service is over, and so too is the tenure of the CEO who led it. The Denver-based photo storing service on Thursday revealed it has slashed its prices and restored millions of photos around the internet hoping to mollify millions of customers it angered last year.

“It’s the first step of many to restore the trust of customers,” said Ted Leonard, Photobucket’s new CEO.

He became CFO at the 15-year-old company in October, after it surprised users worldwide by starting to charge $399.99 for hosting a large number of photos and being able to post them on third-party blogs, ecommerce sites and elsewhere.

John Corpus, Photobucket’s CEO at the time, defended the change, saying a subscription model was necessary given the disparity between the online ad revenue Photobucket’s website generated and the expense of hosting billions of images its 90 million customers stored with Photobucket.

But the pricing, especially the $399.99 a year service that enabled posting images on third-party sites, didn’t convert a meaningful number of Photobucket users into paying subscribers, Leonard said Thursday.

“There’s not a one-plan-fits-all approach to image hosting,” he said. “We can build a subscriber-based business without charging more money than the perceived value of the service.”

Leonard became CEO in March. The company has spent the weeks since them coming up with new pricing and strategies to make 90 million customers happy and generate revenue.

The new prices start at $1.99 per month for 10 gigabytes of images stored and rise to $3.99 monthly for 20 gigabytes and $8.99 for two terabytes of storage. All the plans enable third-party hosting for a $2.49 monthly add-on price.

Photobucket on Wednesday also turned back on millions of users’ images that were still linked to around the web.

The move allowed the images to reappear in place instead of the stock speedometer image that had replaced them last summer. Leonard ruefully joked that speedometer might have become the most viewed image in internet history, though one linked to users’ anger with the company.

“This was weighing on us,” he said. “We wanted to see the images replaced and the internet to be put back together in a sense.”

A pair of Level 3 Communications engineers, Alex Welch and Darren Crystal, formed Photobucket in 2005 to help people to store and use digital photos. Photobucket became the fastest-rising photo storage startup as it grew in parallel with the popularity of MySpace, the first widely-popular social network, where many users of Photobucket posted images.

Fox Interactive, a division of News Corp., bought both MySpace and Photobucket in 2006, envisioning something that presaged Facebook and Instagram. But Facebook soon dwarfed MySpace, and photo-filtering apps took on prominence as smartphones supplanted desktop computers.

News Corp. sold Photobucket in 2010, making an independent, Denver-based company again.

It employed 120 people in downtown’s ballpark neighborhood at its height. Welch, its co-founder, returned to Photobucket at one point after it purchased his photo-sharing app company, but he since left the business.

Today Photobucket has 10 full-time employees and is based at a downtown co-working space.

---

More: https://www.denverpost.com/2018/05/1...hosting-plans/

Quote:

---

Photobucket restores photos “taken hostage,” hopes to lure back customers with cheaper plans after last year’s $399 debacle
Long-time Denver photo site reorganizes with new management and much cheaper price plans

Photobucket is back! And so are all of the photos that disappeared after the Denver company decided last summer to charge up to $399 for hosting images.

The company, which became one of the nation’s largest photo-sharing sites in the early 2000s, said Thursday that it has rejiggered management and wants to do “the right thing for customers” and dropped hosting fees to $2.49 a month or $24.99 a year, though for a limited time, fees are $1.99 a month, or $19.99 a year.

“Our focus since I took over has been customers first,” said Ted Leonard, who joined the company last fall as its finance officer and became CEO in March. “Two months later, we’ve turned back on the images. It’s an important day. Millions of images were restored that were lost forever. Our mission is to bring back customers and regain customer trust.”

For years, Photobucket users could store photos on the site and then link to them on message boards and other third-party websites for free because advertising supported the service. But as advertising dwindled, the company looked for new revenue sources, such as hosting fees. Last June, the company began telling its 100 million registered users that it would soon begin charging $60 to $399 a year to those using the site to host photos.

When the new fee kicked in, millions of images were replaced by a notice that required the image owner to “unlock your account” and upgrade to the new $399 plan.

Customers balked and publicly complained that Photobucket had taken their photos hostage. A Change.org petition attracting 3,663 signatures to demand that Photobucket reverse the fee. At the time, then-CEO John Corpus said that it wasn’t an easy decision and there was no way “to make 100 million global people happy.” Corpus is no longer with the company.

“Anytime you lose a user, whether they’re a paying customer not, it’s tough,” Leonard said. “We took a step back and looked what mistakes were made. But we didn’t spend a lot of time on what went wrong in the past but going forward, what kind of services will be offered. They (customers) want an improved experience and a perceived value of reasonable prices.”

The new price plans will replace the old prices, which are still posted on the site but will be updated as the company rolls out a new website in upcoming weeks. The new plans are:

-- Free: Photo sharing and ad-supported storage only. No third-party hosting.
-- Basic: 2 gigabytes of photo storage and ad free hosting for $2.49 a month
-- Intermediate: 20 GBs of photo storage for $3.99 a month
-- Expert: 2 terabytes of photo storage for $8.99 a month
-- Add third-party hosting to the intermediate or expert plans for $2.49 more per month

The limited time offer plan for $1.99 a month includes 10 GBs of storage and third-party hosting. When the offer ends — and no date has been set as the company is monitoring customer response — users who choose to stay with the company must pick one of the other plans. Annual plans will be discounted.

Leonard said that the 10-person company, which moved out of its Ballpark neighborhood headquarters for smaller digs in RiNo, will continue to offer free advertising-supported photo storage plans and will continue to look for new opportunities to grow revenues.

“We really believe this is the revival of Photobucket. Right now, there’s 10 of us. As we grow and get more competitive, we’re look at different areas for business and places we can expand. I’m a Colorado native and I take a lot of pride in being part of a Denver business.”

---