WTF? Super fires are not a real leusistic?
i was surfing "world of ball pythons" morph list... looking at some super forms... when suddenly a wild Super fire appears!!
i was thinking like "oh super fire... thats just going to be another boring white snake...", pressed on the link and saw this -
http://www.worldofballpythons.com/morphs/super-fire/
now, i know that there's super fires which is all white snake, but can someone explain whats the possibility to get a snake looks like this? (i mean with the color over the white)
Re: WTF? Super fires are not a real leusistic?
Some lines of fires are more prone to producing Supers with yellow. Not all supers will be all white. Just as not all supers will have yellow. I know its not as common to produce a BlkEL with yellows than a solid white. The more yellow, the more desirable/higher price tag.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Re: WTF? Super fires are not a real leusistic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
satomi325
Some lines of fires are more prone to producing Supers with yellow. Not all supers will be all white. Just as not all supers will have yellow. I know its not as common to produce a BlkEL with yellows than a solid white. The more yellow, the more desirable/higher price tag.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Really? I would be more inclined to pay more for a solid white snake with black eyes.... But maybe that's just me. :p
Good to know, though!
Re: WTF? Super fires are not a real leusistic?
i think the yellow ones are much prettier, solid white snakes are pretty boring
and back to the topic - what lines of fire are more likely to produce supers with yellow?
WTF? Super fires are not a real leusistic?
I love the bel's with yellow splotches. I like the all white ones too though. I kinda think of them like pieds (looks wise, not genetically). A high white pied would be nice, but i like the low and medium whites best. Actually, i think i'll just take one of each :D
Re: WTF? Super fires are not a real leusistic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
snakesRkewl
Leucism /ˈljuːsɪzəm/[1] is a condition characterized by reduced pigmentation in animals caused by a recessive allele. Unlike albinism, it is caused by a reduction in all types of skin pigment, not just melanin.
Leucism is a reduction in the pigment and melanin, it does not have to be a pure white animal.
Ivory's are leucistic also :gj:
Some "experts" would say that definition is wrong. I've even herd claims that the reduction in pigment doesn't matter but the reason why the reduction occurs classifies it as lucy or not. Something to do with what actually changes under the skin. Honestly I think this semantics part of biology (IMO) is a little silly, If that is the "real" definition.
To the OP, we use scientific terms loosely and sometime outright incorrect, don't assume a snake looks like something, just because we call it that. As far as the trade is concerned, any super fire or super sulfur is a lucy. Some are just higher yellow than others. I would agree with MarkS as sulfur throws the highest yellow.
Never said it was just a Sulfur thing....however,
Every Super Sulfur I have produced that was not a multigene animal was high orange. Other lines cannot say that, they seem to be hit or miss. I was just commenting on the fact that the photo was EBN, and they have Sulfurs, actually, they have some of the very first Sulfurs and the very first Sulfur Pastels.