» Site Navigation
0 members and 546 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Pearl Ball Python
I realize that i post a lot of stuff on here asking questions about genes but here I go again. So I heard that a woma x woma pairing is fatal because it produces the Pearl morph and that hg woma x hg woma isnt fatal. I thought that woma was a dominant morph not a co-dom with a super?
-
I believe it's the hg woman super that is the fatal pearl. I could be mistaken though. Definitely wouldn't be the first time!
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Yeah thats what i originally thought too. But then I read an old thread on here from last year that said its the woma x woma crossing and it got me all confused :confusd:
Edit: Here is the link http://ball-pythons.net/forums/showt...rl-Ball-python
-
Male: |
Hidden Gene Woma |
Female: |
Hidden Gene Woma |
Percent |
Fraction |
Traits |
25% |
1/4 |
Pearl |
50% |
1/2 |
Hidden Gene Woma |
25% |
1/4 |
Normal |
|
Male: |
|
Female: |
|
Percent |
Fraction |
Traits |
25% |
1/4 |
Homozygous Woma |
50% |
1/2 |
Woma |
25% |
1/4 |
Normal |
|
Homozygous woma would be a woma that produces all woma's. Like a super, but just looks like a woma. No visual difference. (I think thats right lol)
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoseyReps
Male: |
Hidden Gene Woma |
Female: |
Hidden Gene Woma |
Percent |
Fraction |
Traits |
25% |
1/4 |
Pearl |
50% |
1/2 |
Hidden Gene Woma |
25% |
1/4 |
Normal |
|
Male: |
|
Female: |
|
Percent |
Fraction |
Traits |
25% |
1/4 |
Homozygous Woma |
50% |
1/2 |
Woma |
25% |
1/4 |
Normal |
|
Homozygous woma would be a woma that produces all woma's. Like a super, but just looks like a woma. No visual difference. (I think thats right lol)
Thank you that was very helpful :D i thought that was the case but when i came upon that thread it had me doubting myself ha!
-
The real question, is the HGW really a woma or something else?
-
Also, if you look at page 2 of that thread, they clarify it's the HGW x HGW that makes the pearl. It seems like most people just breezed over it, but you can see someone mention it, and then a few others agree and continue with HGW x HGW.
- - - Updated - - -
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebad976
The real question, is the HGW really a woma or something else?
I fully believe the HGW is something else entirely, with a resemblance to the woma. But I'm a newb, so who the heck knows.
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebad976
The real question, is the HGW really a woma or something else?
Well it is a woma because that what it is called, but it is not the same morph as the regular woma. It's very confusing until it is explained to you. I personally feel the HGW's name should be changed completely so to avoid confusion.
-
Woma and HG Woma are two different animals. They kinda look similar but they are two different genes that make then
-
HG Woma x HG Woma = Pearl
Woma x Woma = Pearl
HG Woma x Woma =Pearl (this is the first breeding Kevin ever did with the 2 import snakes)
Hidden Gene Woma And Woma are 2 different morphs just like lesser and Mojave but are most likely part of the same "group"... The combo's are completely different...
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amos1974
HG Woma x HG Woma = Pearl
Woma x Woma = Pearl
HG Woma x Woma =Pearl (this is the first breeding Kevin ever did with the 2 import snakes)
Hidden Gene Woma And Woma are 2 different morphs just like lesser and Mojave but are most likely part of the same "group"... The combo's are completely different...
this is correct to the best of my knowledge. the HGW and 'normal' woma are entirely separate morphs, but any super form of either combination will produce pearls.
-
If hgw X woma makes a pearl then that would mean they are allelic, yes?
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by snakesRkewl
If hgw X woma makes a pearl then that would mean they are allelic, yes?
that would make sense, but I've never worked with either morph.
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by snakesRkewl
If hgw X woma makes a pearl then that would mean they are allelic, yes?
Yes but we may never be able to prove it out because they don't live... Maybe the spider also belongs to this group with fatal supers??
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amos1974
Woma x Woma = Pearl
HG Woma x Woma =Pearl (this is the first breeding Kevin ever did with the 2 import snakes)
first time I've ever heard either of these, have to ask kevin about these. thanks
- - - Updated - - -
i thought the spider HGW were fine, or atleast the lived and were no more wobbly than a normal spider?
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser
first time I've ever heard either of these, have to ask kevin about these.
I believe Kevin in one of his past videos said hgw X woma makes a pearl, would be nice to get some more info on these genes.
-
Re: Pearl Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by snakesRkewl
I believe Kevin in one of his past videos said hgw X woma makes a pearl, would be nice to get some more info on these genes.
only thing I could find was kevin saying HGW litter mate (normal) x HGW could make a pearl. Most people called this another example of the nuller phenomenon.
|