Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 597

1 members and 596 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
  • 06-19-2012, 10:33 AM
    rabernet
    USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule
    Now is the time for all of the Reptile Nation to come together and help in the legal battle. Even if you can only donate $1 or $5 - even if it's once a month or every pay check - we ALL need to contribute if we're able to this fight.

    I know I will - will you?

    http://usark.org/action-alert/usark-...strictor-rule/

    Quote:

    Approximately three months have passed since U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) took the unprecedented action of adding four constricting snakes to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. Never before have animals widely held by the American public been listed. Originally FWS suggested the addition of all of Boa, Python and Eunectes. The list was whittled down to nine constricting snakes after the highly controversial “Risk Assessment” was published by Gordon Rodda and Robert Reed of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The final rule was announced in January 2012. USARK was able to block five of the nine proposed snakes by taking dynamic action against the rule. Never before had a Injurious Wildlife listing been challenged or blocked. Nevertheless, the final rule was enacted March 23rd 2012 with four constricting snakes.


    U.S. Geological Survey
    From the very beginning of this process USARK has been very careful to lay the groundwork and establish the public record that would afford us the ability to take legal action if necessary. Scientists from all over the world have criticized the sloppy and speculative work used by FWS to justify Lacey Act listing. In 2010 USARK filed a formal challenge of the USGS “Risk Assessment” under the Information Quality Act. In 2011 Georgetown Economic Services (GES) published “The Modern Reptile Industry”, an independent and comprehensive economic survey that included the impact that a Lacey Act listing was likely to have on legitimate business interests. The GES report demonstrated how the listing could impact as much as $104 million in trade annually. USARK built a clear and convincing case that FWS was potentially arbitrary and capricious in their zeal for a listing.

    USARK and its counsel are carefully reviewing their legal options for addressing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s unwarranted listing of four constricting snakes, including Burmese pythons, on the Lacey Act’s Injurious Wildlife list. We believe the listing decision was precipitous, unsupported by the best available science, and poor policy. USARK is also concerned about the five other species of snakes, including Boa constrictor, that FWS has deferred addressing.


    High quality captive bred Burmese python morphs
    We believe FWS has exceeded its Lacey Act authority in terms of the breadth of the restrictions placed on the four listed species. The organization will continue to develop its legal theories and develop a plan for addressing the industry’s legitimate concerns with the proposed and final rules.

    These legal maneuvers are not inexpensive, and will be even more costly if it is necessary to file a federal lawsuit. Our goal is to raise $250,000 between now and the end of the year. This is only a start. If we file a lawsuit it could easily require twice that amount. FWS doesn’t think that the Reptile Nation is capable of fielding a serious legal challenge to their arbitrary Lacey Act listing. They don’t think we can raise the money. We have waited until our legal team gave us the word that they felt we have a strong and clear course of action to follow. Now is the time for the Reptile Nation to stand up and take back what is ours!

    Please use PayPal to donation@usark.org. Please put “LAW” in the comment or note area; or you can mail a check to: USARK, PO Box 279, Grandy, NC 27939. Please put “LAW” in the memo line.
  • 06-19-2012, 10:40 AM
    gsarchie
    I'll make a donation of $50 right now and every month to this email address on paypal if you can guarantee the adress' legitimacy. I trust that it would go to USARK but how would I know that it would go specifically towards the challenege of the what I have coined "the big 4" being added to the FWS injurious wildife list? Thanks,
    Bruce
  • 06-19-2012, 01:00 PM
    Dragoon
    Re: USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by gsarchie View Post
    I'll make a donation of $50 right now and every month to this email address on paypal if you can guarantee the adress' legitimacy. I trust that it would go to USARK but how would I know that it would go specifically towards the challenege of the what I have coined "the big 4" being added to the FWS injurious wildife list? Thanks,
    Bruce

    I would rather trust the usark website and go through the donation link, and you should be able to add notes to paypal transfers.
  • 06-19-2012, 01:48 PM
    rabernet
    Re: USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Dragoon View Post
    I would rather trust the usark website and go through the donation link, and you should be able to add notes to paypal transfers.

    Follow the link in my initial post, which takes you directly to USARK's statement, which I simply copied and pasted. :)
  • 06-19-2012, 01:49 PM
    rabernet
    Re: USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by gsarchie View Post
    I'll make a donation of $50 right now and every month to this email address on paypal if you can guarantee the adress' legitimacy. I trust that it would go to USARK but how would I know that it would go specifically towards the challenege of the what I have coined "the big 4" being added to the FWS injurious wildife list? Thanks,
    Bruce

    They state to put "Law" in the subject of your donation. :)
  • 06-19-2012, 02:48 PM
    Vypyrz
    Re: USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule
    Donation sent, to protect my pets...
  • 06-19-2012, 03:00 PM
    Andybill
    I donated! Will you? :gj: lol!
  • 06-19-2012, 03:46 PM
    Valentine Pirate
    I'll keep donating. $30 a paycheck isn't much but they always get it. I'm so tired of having to wonder what the hobby will look like in 10 years due to ignorance, can't do much but not giving up!
  • 06-19-2012, 07:04 PM
    WarriorPrincess90
    I'm out of a job at the moment, but I think this is extremely important. I will give at least $20. And I encourage everyone else to give as much as they can to help fight this fight. :gj:
  • 06-20-2012, 06:59 PM
    thedarkwolf25
    Shared in on Facebook (not that it will do much) and will be donating what I can out of my next paycheck
  • 06-20-2012, 07:56 PM
    LLLReptile
    Re: USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule
    You can donate through our website as well - the donate to USARK option on any of the pages sends your donation directly to USARK.

    http://lllreptile.com/store/catalog/...eptile-rights/

    Loren is a board member on USARK helping with the fight (I believe as a result of his personal donations, in addition to LLLReptile as a company donating money), and most of the staff here donate or are members as well.

    We're fighting with you!

    -Jen
  • 06-20-2012, 09:04 PM
    Coleslaw007
    We'll be donating. Idk how much yet, gotta get paid.

    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
  • 08-24-2012, 08:58 PM
    Skiploder
    Hey USARK......

    How much of the $250K have you collected?

    Have you procured the service of a legal counselor yet? If so, who is it?

    If you collect the $250K and decide NOT to pursue the lawsuit, will we get our donations back?

    I thought, that from your previous posts, that the FWS was so sloppy and their position so untenable, that this challenge should be a no brainer. However, after reading your mass forum posting, I am confused........

    An update would help. Actually, an update is owed to everyone who has donated. There are a lot of people here who are breathlessly waiting for an update.......before you put out a call for more dinero, perhaps you should post that update............
  • 08-25-2012, 02:42 PM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Actually, I want my donation to go to the 'other stuff', because I don't want them to stop fighting all the other bad legislation while dealing with the lacey act shenanigans. I want that legal battle to succeed, but I don't own any of the 4, so, I want to be sure that nothing else comes along in the meantime that threatens MY animals.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1