Re: Spiders and pinstripes
The genetics wizard is apparently assuming spider is a dominant mutation because that's what the founder says it is although I think he admits he didn't do the breedings to actually prove that. Many of us speculate that the lack of a public proven homozygous spider could be caused by the mutation actually being homozygous lethal which would technically be co-dominant. However, if that is the case it would be pretty much impossible to ever prove; we would just go on and on with no answer like we have now for 20+ years.
Pinstripe on the other hand has actually been proven to be a dominant mutation. The pinstripe founder reports producing a homozygous pinstripe that looks like the regular heterozygous pinstripes but proved homozygous by producing a large number of only pinstripe babies (100% pinstripe clutches rather than the normal expected 50% pinstripe when bred to normal for pinstripes). So, pinstripe is known not to be homozygous lethal. Also, the homozygous pinstripe genotype looks just like the heterozygous pinstripe genotype which is what classifies the mutation as dominant.
Re: Spiders and pinstripes
the wizard doesn't differentiate between homozygous and heterozygous dominant traits that's all. like said above, there no evidence of anything with the spider besides rumors and hearsay and the pin is proven dominant.
Re: Spiders and pinstripes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mike41793
What if he was just really really lucky with that clutch? .
I don't know...I know breeders who have had 100% pin clutches. They were a Pin to a Normal breedings.
Re: Spiders and pinstripes
True, technically you could never prove a dominant either; there would always be some miniscule chance you were just lucky with a het. I forget how many only pinstripe offspring he reported but I did the math at the time and was convinced he really did have a homozygous pinstripe.
Last I heard TSK is doing some work with actual records in an attempt to produce and prove a homozygous spider. Perhaps their numbers will eventually be enough for some to make up their mind on what sort of mutation is spider.
Re: Spiders and pinstripes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RandyRemington
For example, you COULD produce 20 pins in a row from a regular heterozygous pin to normals but the odds of doing that would be literally 1 in 1 million (technically 1 in 1,048,576). At that point I would just assume the pin was homozygous and the mutation dominant.
I thought the number brian gave me was 27 eggs so thats over 1 in a hundred million.
Re: Spiders and pinstripes
TSK gave numbers on a couple of spider X spider clutches. I remember at one point they were running right about 1/4 small eggs that didn't hatch. It was a small sample size and could have just been luck/bad luck. Last I heard they were planning to breed all the hatchlings looking for a homozygous spider starting last year or the year before I think.
Re: Spiders and pinstripes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LotsaBalls
Ok so what are the odds of producing only spiders in a clutch of seven. With only one parent being a spider?
The odds of this are 0.78125% if the spider parent is heterozygous. The odds are 100% if the spider parent is homozygous.