"Husky Lucy"?

Does anyone think it's possible or is anyone trying to create a cross of blue eyed and black eyed lucys to create a "husky lucy" with one blue eye and one black eye? :confused: When I'm bored my mind wanders and I think of odd things like this lol

thats not how it works

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/c...doublelucy.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BAMReptiles

thats not how it works

http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/c...doublelucy.jpg

---

Wait, that's seriously a double lucy?

Does that mean someone has produced a Fire/Lesser?

idk if its a fire lesser...... but yes thats a double lucy

Well I looked it up and I saw it was from fire/mojave, which is a spectacular looking animal. I would kill to see a Fire/lesser... lets just hope my fire female is up for breeding this year.

I believe the double lucy is a sulfer mojo combo.
I wouldn't be surprised if the fire lesser combo has been done also.

i thought i read somewhere that fire/sulfer = the same thing?

Same concept as Butter/Lesser = Same Thing. It's open to debate.

so it does in fact have the possibility of having 2 different colored eyes??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DJ_Bizarre

so it does in fact have the possibility of having 2 different colored eyes??

---

There is no reason to think this would happen unless it were to be produced, and likely that animal would be a paradox.

Simply one form of leucism is going to override another, regrettably my bio course never covered the term for this and I only learned about it once, when I was asking a similar question to my bio professor to find out about one gene overriding another gene (Albinism over dark hair for example).

Safe to say what happens is one of the genes will block expression of the other, so one of them will show, and the other will not. For example if the black eyed lucy gene were to be genetically "stronger" than the blue eyed lucy gene then black eyes would show, and vice versa.

There is no reason to think both will show (one in one eye and another in the other), this would be an entirely separate genetic trait/fluke.

i read that they doesnt pop up in the first breeding- like when u breed a lesser to a fire, u do not get double lucys in the first breeding, but babys they look like a mix out of bth. when u breed them back to each other, u get the double lucys


not sure if thats true, but i read it here on bp.net

Considering that to get a super fire or a super lesser (black and blue eyed lucys respectively) you need to breed a fire to a fire or a lesser to a less, then no you wouldnt get a lucy by breeding a lesser to a fire. You'd have to breed the lesser fires to eachother and you'd have a 6.25% chance of producing a double lucy.

Fire Lesser, 07 clutch # 77

http://www.ralphdavisreptiles.com/co...ched/07_clutch

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MRI_Reptiles

Fire Lesser, 07 clutch # 77

http://www.ralphdavisreptiles.com/co...ched/07_clutch

---

Friggin awesome! I've been looking for a pic of one for a year. Thanks.