Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 587

0 members and 587 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
  • 07-16-2009, 08:46 PM
    Watever
    Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Does any one have a picture of a normal woma-lesser ?

    Not the ones NERD produced with the hidden-gene but the ones without it.

    Does it look like a lesser bee ? Or it's a bit different ?

    Thank you :)

    And does anyone have any idea if the lesser pearl NERD hatched in 2006 survived ? Cause we never heard of, so I would assume not, but well we never know, since he keep stuff secret :D

    Thank you guys (and girls)
  • 07-16-2009, 08:49 PM
    rabernet
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Watever View Post
    Does any one have a picture of a normal woma-lesser ?

    Not the ones NERD produced with the hidden-gene but the ones without it.

    Does it look like a lesser bee ? Or it's a bit different ?

    Thank you :)

    And does anyone have any idea if the lesser pearl NERD hatched in 2006 survived ? Cause we never heard of, so I would assume not, but well we never know, since he keep stuff secret :D

    Thank you guys (and girls)

    Kevin has stated that the Pearl appears to be a lethal combination, he's not had any survive. I've not seen any adult Pearls the two times I've spent a week there, with full access to their collection, so I don't believe he's keeping that secret.

    I am not sure I've seen a picture of a lesser/woma (no hidden gene) combo.
  • 07-16-2009, 09:28 PM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rabernet View Post
    Kevin has stated that the Pearl appears to be a lethal combination, he's not had any survive. I've not seen any adult Pearls the two times I've spent a week there, with full access to their collection, so I don't believe he's keeping that secret.

    I am not sure I've seen a picture of a lesser/woma (no hidden gene) combo.

    Thank you :)

    I tought the exact same thing, no pearl survived yet. But I also heard that with other combination, they could survive, but I have never seen any of those, other than the baby lesser pearl from 2006 I think.
  • 07-17-2009, 08:29 AM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Watever View Post
    Does any one have a picture of a normal woma-lesser ?

    Not the ones NERD produced with the hidden-gene but the ones without it.

    Does it look like a lesser bee ? Or it's a bit different ?

    http://photos.imageevent.com/corners...amacallit1.jpg
  • 07-17-2009, 08:54 AM
    DarkComeSoon
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    wow thats beautiful
  • 07-17-2009, 09:18 AM
    asplundii
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    I am sorry to question you Louis but I do not see any of the indicators that I come to associate with Woma in that animal (head patch, moustache, light eye...) Are you cetain on the ID?
  • 07-17-2009, 10:38 AM
    Watever
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Thank you very much Louis !!!

    asplundii : There is lot of variation in the woma, like in the spider. With the funky pattern, I think it's one. Remember that lesser will modify the pattern also etc... :)
  • 07-17-2009, 10:47 AM
    asplundii
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Wat: Yeah I know Woma have a lot of variation

    http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r...P6230016_2.jpg

    But some of the things are kind of diffinative to the morph... things I would look for in determining a combo. I know Lesser will modify the pattern but I would not expect it to erase all of the traits I have come to associate with a Woma...

    Also, I am not trying to say that that animal is not the combo. I am just saying that I do not see it. If Louis can tell me what identifiers he is using I might very well be able to see the combo nature... as it is though that just looks like a really nice Lesser to me
  • 07-17-2009, 11:31 AM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    I am sorry to question you Louis but I do not see any of the indicators that I come to associate with Woma in that animal (head patch, moustache, light eye...) Are you cetain on the ID?

    He was produced by Ballistic Morphs. Here's a pic of his mom that Debbie sent me when I purchased him.

    http://photos.imageevent.com/corners...Womalesser.jpg
  • 07-17-2009, 11:43 AM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Woma - Lesser Picture ? (No hidden gene)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    ... as it is though that just looks like a really nice Lesser to me

    When you see him in person (in snake?) he looks very different from any of the Lessers we have. The pattern is different as are the colors. It's hard to capture his true colors in a photograph. I know because I've tried several times without success. :(

    While I'm posting pics, here is one Debbie sent me of his daddy.

    http://photos.imageevent.com/corners...Womalesser.jpg
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1