Re: The Blue-Eyed Leucistic Ball Python
I pretty sure you are right, Tim. I was thinking of them displaying the pigment, but I definitely didn't word it that way. I had a brain fart with the lack of chromatiphore. This whole last week has been one giant brain fart for me.
Re: The Blue-Eyed Leucistic Ball Python
So in a typical Mojave-Lesser cross, the odds for a BEL are 25%, does that change at all if you do a Pastave-Lesser cross? What would be the breakdown for clutch odds?
Re: The Blue-Eyed Leucistic Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by
krinklebearcat
So in a typical Mojave-Lesser cross, the odds for a BEL are 25%, does that change at all if you do a Pastave-Lesser cross? What would be the breakdown for clutch odds?
12.5% WT
12.5% lesser
12.5% mojave,
12.5% mojave, lesser,
12.5% pastel
12.5% pastel, lesser,
12.5% pastel, mojave,
12.5% pastel, mojave, lesser,
Re: The Blue-Eyed Leucistic Ball Python
Excelent post on this topic!!!
Re: The Blue-Eyed Leucistic Ball Python
Quote:
Originally Posted by
asplundii
I am not sure I would say that. The snake produced by a mystic x mojo or a phantom x phantom is a blue eyed snake with a bit of pattern showing through... We do not say that mojo x mojo are not BluELs just cause they have a purple head, we just say they are "dirty". So by the same token, the mystic x mojo and the super phantom (and one presumes the super mystic and the phantom x mojo) are just "really really dirty" BluELs.
At least that is how I look at it.
thats how i look at it 2:D