Re: Help Me Win This Arguement!
I'm a Chuck fan too,but Chinese Boxing all the way!!Bruce would also dominate today in the Lightweight Division with his standup.He even had basic ground game back in the day,so if he was presently training,he would have mad skills.
Re: Help Me Win This Arguement!
If the OP is asking for a serious answer, then Bruce Lee is the winner. Chuck Norris himself has said in interviews that Bruce was the better. He is quoted as saying that he was "the fastest person he's ever seen."
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darkice
Any MMA fighter could take either of them. Im a HUGE Bruce Lee fan but if he entered the ring with any MMA fighter he would find himself on the ground punded into a bleeding pile of pulp.
You can't really say that. MMA has rules. Bruce Lee never fought a sanctioned fight in his life. To him real fights were life and death struggles that did not have rules. As a former (due to injury) paracticioner of Martial Arts, I concur. True MA is about real fights in real situations. There are things the MMA's do that, while in a ring with rules is dominating, are easily defended againts in a reality. Commercialized MA's are a joke. TKD and Karate has been so diluted that so few practice the real thing anymore. Whoa! I feel a rant coming.
Anyways, I'll stop before I accidentally hijack the thread.
Re: Help Me Win This Arguement!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mainbutter
This.
Bruce Lee>
Re: Help Me Win This Arguement!
I agree that Bruce was the better fighter, but in an exhibition fight Chuck actually won. If it were anything but an exhibition I believe Bruce would have destroyed him as he was just too fast to defend against.