Re: The elusive homozygous spider...?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tjohn310
I think that the person with the "dominant" spider should breed the babies back to it, even though it's in-breeding and incest, but it will also help determine the answers. Don't know whether that particular ball python is left but the thing is that most of these spiders have a genetic head wobble and we don't have the answers to that yet either. The spider morph is beautiful alone and is great for creativity and it would be great if we knew more about them so its actually a great thing that Raven86 has re-sparked this conversation.
Then we will agree to disagree on this one.
Since this post died in April 2009, there are no less than 9 pages of results when you type "homozygous spider" into the search bar. Granted, not every single one of those posts are on this exact topic, but more than a handful of them are. Most recently, there is a 13 page thread on the topic that has its last contributing post dated August 1, 2013 (and it's first on September 17, 2012). Shouldn't you be able to find the relevant conversation you're seeking regarding this topic there instead of pulling for a 3.5 year old three page thread to be revisited?
Just sayin'...
Re: The elusive homozygous spider...?
Why not start it up again,
your using it aren't you? It got your attention right?
Re: The elusive homozygous spider...?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tjohn310
Why not start it up again,
your using it aren't you? It got your attention right?
Because unless your mapping the bp genome, there is nothing more to be said on the topic, its been beaten to death, and nothing new has been discovered.
