Re: cheap but cool morph?
the most inexpensive, and cool morph, is a simple wild-type pattern. There really are no "normals", as there is nothing "normal" about any of them. They are all very unique in their own ways.
Re: cheap but cool morph?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PythonWallace
I think that with the length of time the spider has been around, we would see a lot of cases of high in-egg fatality rate if this was the case.
Without developing a base line, it's hard to determine if Spider x Spider has a higher, lower or average in-egg fatality rate. That means we have to get the a LOT of data from, say Pastel x Pastel and Lesser x Lesser breedings, and a LOT of data from Spider x Spider breedings to find out if there is a significantly higher in-egg fatality rate.
And even if there is no disparity, there's still the possibility at some point early on in the fertalization process the egg stops developing, and is simply disposed of prior to any growth. I simply don't know enough about bp phyisology to be certain of anything... but the fact that we have NO proven homozygous Spiders must mean something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladywhipple02
Pffft.... that thread was so last week. :P
Re: cheap but cool morph?
Just tryin' to keep this thread on topic Justin... the poor guy was asking about an affordable morph, and here we are, talking about spider genetics! Lol!
Re: cheap but cool morph?
Compare even a dull Pastel to a Normal, and you'll see.. pics do not often do them justice.
Re: cheap but cool morph?
... i agree with what other people have been saying about cool patterns too. you can find some awesome pattered snakes for under 100
Re: cheap but cool morph?
at narbc today i saw a ton of mojaves for $400 and pastels were $125 give or take. i even saw one for $80 and he had some nice color...granted i was looking at males because i want something to breed to my girl...
