Super or not?

Within a shed or two, you'll have your answer. I had one earlier in the year that everyone swore was a Super Pastel, but it was a Pastel x Black Pastel breeding. Within a few sheds it was obvious she wasn't a Super; however, she's still the nicest Pastel I've personally seen, but a Pastel nonetheless.

In my opinion, it's a lovely Pastel. Either way, he's a keeper! I'd love to see updated pictures. :)

I would say it's one of the cleanest pastel I have seen of.

The body is of a super but the head is not enough light I think. But I could be really wrong.

You should wait for him to age a bit. I have seen some babies that are soo light that they even look axanthic, but after a few shed the colors are back.

Do you have any pictures of where the sides meet the belly?

Rick

if that turns out to be a normal pastel, not a super, breed it to your lightest pastels. Find out if you can prove it to be a new line. That'd be FAN FRIGGIN TASTIC! Imagine supers of that. It'd be like having super supers.

I would say that it is probably a super, but I have hatched out some normal pastels that look very similar.

New pic's Bro!!!

Would help to see a good picture of the sides...

An example would be..

Top = Super (Note: super is in shed)
Bottom = Pastel

http://www.siscoreptiles.com/ball%20...l-vs-super.jpg

I'd say it's a super. Not as much blushing as some, but looks like a super nonetheless.