Re: recessive, co-dom, dominate
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stevenkeogh
Why would you use the center of the Earth as a reference point? It is impossible to be below the center of the Earth when you consider gravitational pull and that apart from gravity, there is no up, above, below, or under
Well I was just using hyperbole to make a point :P But yes you are correct, there can be no "below" the center of the earth LOL
Quote:
The reference points (in relation to above or under), would be typical ground level, sea level, or the floor of the well as a modified ground level. Could it then be in relation to the level of the water?
The reference point can be anything you want it to be actually. I could use the crust/mantle boundary or the mantle/outer core boundary if I wanted. Or I could use an ambiguous spot exactly 6" below the well. The point I was trying to make is that you need a specific point of reference before you can say definitively that you are "above" or "below".
Quote:
Haha, this is quite off the original topic.
My apologies to the OP. I'll shut up now (or as soon as I answer GenePirate)
Re: recessive, co-dom, dominate
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GenePirate
OK, I did a BLASTn and this sequence is fairly homologous to several genes in any number of creatures from humans to zebrafish to rice and a fair number of beasties in between. And asplundii is the species name for several different botanical forms. So spill, 'cause it's driving me crazy. What's the sequence?
Well my handle and the sequence have nothing in common. I use asplundii after Utricularia asplundii which is one of many plants I grow.
BLAST won't give you the answer to the sequence either I am afraid because it is not specific to any given organism.
I'll PM you to keep you from going nuts :D
