Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 685

1 members and 684 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,176
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan

Initial vet visits?

Printable View

  • 12-02-2004, 03:54 PM
    Shelby
    Ah ok, well I agree with that completely. Not only is that bad for the animals, it gives us herpers a bad name when people don't properly care for them.

    I've met some pretty pitiful snake keepers myself.
  • 12-02-2004, 04:40 PM
    green_man
    Quote:

    I think green_mans comment and my follow up were reffering to our experiences with soo many people that know an animal should be taken to a vet, but would rather spend the money on video games or lottery tickets.
    oh yes, definately didnt mean you Shelby :)

    I just see too much of people barely scraping up enough money to purchase the animal, but have no idea how much upkeaping said animal is actually going to cost! I got charged 75 dollars for the vet to take a look at my boa for 3 minutes and perscribe some drops for mucas in his mouth.
    The initial cost of a snake is probably the cheapest part of owning one.
  • 12-02-2004, 04:46 PM
    Shelby
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by green_man
    The initial cost of a snake is probably the cheapest part of owning one.

    That's true for most animals. Try getting a horse! :shock:
  • 12-02-2004, 05:03 PM
    green_man
    lol, no kidding.
    My wife wants a horse badly. I cant afford the 400 bucks a month to stable one though.
  • 12-02-2004, 05:11 PM
    Shelby
    Yeah.. I have a thoroughbred. 400/mo is expensive.. wow. But you also have to figure all the other stuff...

    Um.. yeah, we're talking about snakes! No, really, not off topic!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1