Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 725

0 members and 725 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda

Caramel VS Ultramel

Printable View

  • 01-15-2014, 06:59 PM
    digizure
    There are a couple of things I want to do with the ultramel gene. I don't want to get into caramels so I just feel there is not point shelling out hundreds of dollars more for the caramillo. Your points are valid but personally, I don't really want caramel gene in my collection.
  • 01-15-2014, 09:44 PM
    iCandiBallPythons
    Visually (not breedability) caramel albino hands down, I have just never like the ultramels or the combos look
  • 01-16-2014, 01:12 AM
    digizure
    Really? I think ultramels looks a whole lot better than caramels. :)
  • 01-16-2014, 02:19 AM
    iCandiBallPythons
    Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by digizure View Post
    Really? I think ultramels looks a whole lot better than caramels. :)

    Next to this female most deff not.
    http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/01/16/me7ana4a.jpg

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
  • 01-16-2014, 04:11 AM
    snakesRkewl
    Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by digizure View Post
    Really? I think ultramels looks a whole lot better than caramels. :)

    100% agree.
  • 01-16-2014, 04:36 AM
    h00blah
    I have seen smokin hot caramels and smokin hot ultramels :gj:. It takes a REALLY nice caramel to make me turn my head :gj:. There are way more hot ultramels in my book than ugly ones. Ultramel also combos differently, and more extreme. I like both, but I prefer ultramel for sure.
  • 01-16-2014, 02:45 PM
    digizure
    What do you guys think of the picture I posted? (on the second page)
  • 01-16-2014, 02:59 PM
    Pythonfriend
    Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by digizure View Post
    What do you guys think of the picture I posted? (on the second page)

    it looks really nice, i like the contrast and the colors. i didnt say anything about the picture earlier because i cannot tell if its a crider or an ultramel. the shape of the head looks a bit weird, the rear part of the head, behind the eyes, looks quite big. but i dont know what to make of it.
  • 01-17-2014, 03:24 PM
    Badgemash
    Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Pythonfriend View Post
    thats really interesting.

    but then: why not still go for it? as long as you know what you have, whats the problem with working with a smaller line that does the same things, if its so much cheaper? like with axanthic, different people work with different lines, and working with a smaller line is fine and its about the resulting optics. and people argue which lines of axanthic look the best. and for each line, there are people working with it.

    so, even if they look almost the same but are incompatible (i am not sure yet, there does not seem to be much solid data), why not still go for it?

    There's no reason not to go for it, and there should be more results coming out on compatibility in the next few months, although there's enough evidence against it that I'm not hopeful. You would just want to be very certain of which line you're actually getting, because just like axanthics there is a noticeable price difference depending on which line you choose, and they're awfully hard to tell apart.

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by digizure View Post
    What do you guys think of the picture I posted? (on the second page)

    I think she's cute and I like her.
  • 01-20-2014, 09:36 AM
    Lexcorn
    Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1