Update on one crazy Mojave

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mike41793

http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/11/11/me7a5ugu.jpg

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stoaob3

Polymorphism as in there are extremes to every morph. There's polymorphism In any single gene. Their will always be odd balls yeah het pied does stuff technically two genes involved but there still seems to be something else in play.

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

---

This, lol, polymorphism from its Latin roots means "many forms". Not necessarily speaking of extremes as much as it is dealing with diversity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Physician&Snakes

This, lol, polymorphism from its Latin roots means "many forms". Not necessarily speaking of extremes as much as it is dealing with diversity.

---

Exactly were are talking about the same thing. All morphs have differences with in themselves

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stoaob3

Exactly were are talking about the same thing. All morphs have differences with in and among themselves

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

---

Don't worry guys, I fixedid it, :cool: . Sorry to be detail oriented but genetics requires it.

Oh ok, i get it now. "Morphs" is a poor choice of wording when applied to balls because of the way we use it in the hobby i suppose. Makes sense though.

I'm still just seeing mojo het pied and wondering what else you're seeing though...

Well, I'll be happy with some White Gold (mojave pieds) and I've got him a nice Vanilla Het. Pied/hypo to go with. Would love to see a Mojave Vanilla Pied one day! :)

Extremes would be relevant to the individual. A new person to the hobby might not think there is much difference between a very reduced patterned normal and a very busy patterned normal, to me or some other individuals it might be and 'extreme' difference. Why even argue about it when we are basically talking about the same thing....it's all relative to the individual

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

Relative to the individual *

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stoaob3

Extremes would be relevant to the individual. A new person to the hobby might not think there is much difference between a very reduced patterned normal and a very busy patterned normal, to me or some other individuals it might be and 'extreme' difference. Why even argue about it when we are basically talking about the same thing....it's all relative to the individual

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

---

I am afraid there is a difference...
Extreme: farthest from ordinary
Diversity: displaying multiple points of difference

These are both qualitative terms to an extent; however, the former speaks of only one area of difference, whereas the latter is an umbrella term for all points of difference in a population, hence its tie to the term polymorphism: many forms. Your argument seems to say that the individual keeper has his or her own definitions of morphs and genetics, this is of course plausible; however, we must use the most logical and agreed upon terms when discussing such areas with others. How many different names do you think me and my lab partners have for all the machinery and tests we perform? Tons, but the "official" name goes on the research paper.

Wow stfu, way too much time on your hands , reading into things a little much

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stoaob3

Wow stfu, way too much time on your hands , reading into things a little much

Sent from my ADR6410LRA using Tapatalk

---

Lol, no offense meant bud. I have had some pretty nit picky teachers so I guess it rubbed off. :cool: