blue lucy x normal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Beardedragon

Look at what I qouted, and then read mine. I am not saying you are wrong at all, I know very well what you are talking about, perhaps more than you, you are very right, but you have not gotten the meaning to my post and correcting information to something I was not telling. And actually Oxy agree'd to what both of said, I take it he/she knows what I am talking about.

---

ah the wording at the front was pretty confusing. but yea im a bio major soo its a safe bet i know a fair amount dealing with genetics. most people misstate lots of genetic stuff on here so i was just trying to make it more clear, if that makes any sense lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BAMReptiles

ah the wording at the front was pretty confusing. but yea im a bio major soo its a safe bet i know a fair amount dealing with genetics. most people misstate lots of genetic stuff on here so i was just trying to make it more clear, if that makes any sense lol.

---

Its fine :P Now... what I was Stating was, Oxy pointed out that you would not get any "hets" from a bel, unless it is a "het" russo. I have owned a russo Bel, and know a good bit about them. Now of course all codom morphs are Het for the super form, but in the Bp world I was stating that we use the term het for Ressesive morphs, and not in fact color or pattern morphs. Just like we do not call the pastel, a Het Super pastel. Yes, it is, but you can tell a pastel from a normal. Oxy stated that you would only get hets if the Russo gene is involved, and that may confuse newer members, so I was simply stating that even though it is called a het russo, it is indeed what we call Codom morphs because it effects color, and you can tell the difference between normals and Het russos. If you bred a het russo to a normal, you would not get Possible hets, you would know what you have. It is a name flaw really.

Make sense?

yup we use a lot of slang genetic terms in the ball ypthon world, co-dom doesnt exist its really incomplete dominant >_< but yea i get what youre saying now. interesting about the russos tho. from the pics i cant really see much different from a normal as well. is it that much more noticable in person like with yellow bellys and spotnoses?

They're yellow. Almost like a fire. At least that is what I gathered based on what I have seen. Considering many normals can be in that same range of yellow I assumed, at first, that the yellow was the same kind of yellow on normals. However between the posts pointing out that it is visual, and the pictures, the only assumption I am left with is that the yellow is the trait that they show (like a fire).

It's very noticeable in these pictures:

http://www.cuttingedgeherp.com/nss-f...tLuckyNorm.jpg
http://www.cuttingedgeherp.com/nss-f...etLuckys04.JPG

Also I'm glad you guys sorted that out, haha, I was just reading the posts and thought I'd have to come in here and explain it. I too am a "bio major" (biochem/neuroscience hoping to do research and go on to an MD/PhD program for neuroscience) and while I just got out of my first year of college I did end up having a little genetics, and talked a lot more with my teacher about the topic, thanks to BPs.

oh wow, thats super noticeable in that first pic