Terry Cullen raided

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bsd13

Interesting. I can't help but wonder why people at the beginning were all ready to defend this guy to the death, even despite the charges of false imprisonment and sexual assault, but many turned against him when the pictures and details of the animals came out.

Am I the only person who sees something wrong with this?

---

Well as with anything as proof is produced your opinions can change!!

I would hope and pray that everyone would come to this guys side until such time that the evidence indicates he's guilty.

After all, isn't that what our freedom is predicated on? Innocent until proven guilty. Far too many times we as a society, have this backwards.

Good luck to the guy, but if he is guilty, he should have to pay his dues.
Jim Smith

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joepythons

Well the answer is simple.The pictures and videos were proof of wrong doings.The other part that seems to have been removed from his list of charges were just hear say :rolleyes:

---

They dropped the sexual assault and false imprisonment charges?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPelizabeth

Well as with anything as proof is produced your opinions can change!!

---

True, but that's not what I was getting at. There were and still seem to be people in this thread and other places that have this twisted notion that the false imprisonment and sexual assault charges aren't that big of a deal, but the animal neglect charges are a huge, huge problem. That's what I was getting at.

That's probably because the false imprisonment and sexual assault charges are based on he said/she said, without proof posted. The animal neglect is backed up by a few photos and video, although again.. most of what I saw wasn't abuse(snakes in tupperware isn't abuse), there was a lot of very bad stuff, like the dead croc and dead snake.

I can't speak for everyone, but I base my opinions on posted proof, not on hearsay. Trust me, if some person popped up and said you sexually assaulted them, I'd have the same opinion of "is there proof?". I'm all for rapists getting punished, there's no excuse for raping someone. But I won't leap onto a person if there's no proof of it. I also find the "false imprisonment" charge to be a bit of a reach, since the victim didn't say he restrained her or forced her to stay, he didn't lock her in where she couldn't get out. IF it's true as she stated it, he told her it was dangerous outside, and she decided it was better to stay than to try to leave. If I thought a guy was going to sexually assault me, I think I'd leave, no matter how dangerous HE said it was outside. But then.. I'm not her.. I wasn't there.. I don't know whether she's making up stuff to sound like she's a victim, or if he was intimidating, or what. So I only react to the stuff with proof. The abuse and neglect.

so did I miss something.....were the sexual assualt charges dropped??:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tonyaltn

Pause the video at 1:42.....is that alligators jaws deformed ? They look like they are curved up, maybe from being in to small of a tank for to long, or is it just the video making it look odd ?

---

It definatly looks bad, I noticed that too. It does look deformed but it also looks very narrow and long and not at all like an alligator, I was wondering if it might be some species of crocodille or maybe a gharial? Kind of hard to tell other then it looks really wrong.

anything new on this?

It's funny when the "experts" are caught red-handed. Hahaha!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valleysnakeguy

It's funny when the "experts" are caught red-handed. Hahaha!

---

A real scream :confused: