Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 651

1 members and 650 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,191
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda

Spider question

Printable View

  • 09-01-2009, 01:36 PM
    RandyRemington
    Re: Spider question
    I think it's not so often what we don't know that gets us as what we "know" but isn't so.

    We where so sure that the gender of the spider parent didn't matter that we might miss a legitimate trend in the data we never bother to look at.

    I would think that the "normal" males where just "normal for spider" and where indeed other morphs that we would not expect to have any effect (although here too would be nice to see what the data tells us).

    If this data, the trends, and the analysis hold up we'll want to figure out why this is happening even though we didn't expect it. My bet would be that spider sperm are some how less effective (maybe they flip their heads up and get lost on the way to the egg, lol) but that spider egg cells are at least as easily fertilized as normals and maybe spider embryos have a better survival rate, perhaps the reported spider vigor.
  • 09-01-2009, 02:15 PM
    Egapal
    Re: Spider question
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Egapal View Post
    Given that the OP posted his results even to us with omitted data shows just how unreliable people can be when giving numbers. Further it sounded to me like the OP was very delibrate in his omission of data. I don't recall anyone asking him to make things even so it seams like he did so "to make it more fair"

    Sorry I reread this thread and I missed everyone asking him for equal numbers of male and female spiders. I think the point people were trying to make is that each set of data has different levels of accuracy based on the sample size. The larger the sample the more accurate that data. Having them be equal doesn't help things though. The smaller sample will always be less accurate than the larger sample.

    But again he is trying to prove something that is not true. If it were true the numbers would not even be as close to 50/50 as he is showing. Now if there is a hypothesis on the table I would love to hear it, but "I think it might have something to do with sex linkage" is not a hypothesis.
  • 09-01-2009, 10:02 PM
    DM1975
    Re: Spider question
    Quote:

    I'm anxious to see the results, but I want it to be 50% male vs 50% female
    Quote:

    Agreed! The results will be innacurate unless the results are from 2000 male spiders and 2000 female spiders!
    I guess you read too fast ;)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1