Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 834

0 members and 834 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,120
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud

waitin' on it..

Printable View

  • 11-19-2008, 01:20 AM
    PythonWallace
    Re: waitin' on it..
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Dr_Gonz0 View Post
    vvv?

    Robin

    Arrows pointing down at the challenging responses about how snakes and dogs are like comparing apples and orengutans.
  • 11-19-2008, 01:25 AM
    Dr_Gonz0
    Re: waitin' on it..
    They are both animals no? They both contain genes that they pass to their offspring. Limit the amount of genes in the pool, and the effect is the same, whether it be dogs or snakes or humans for that matter.

    Robin
  • 11-19-2008, 01:37 AM
    Dr_Gonz0
    Re: waitin' on it..
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Dr_Gonz0 View Post
    They are both animals no? They both contain genes that they pass to their offspring. Limit the amount of genes in the pool, and the effect is the same, whether it be dogs or snakes or humans for that matter.

    Robin

    The only reason i used dogs as an example is because they have been selective breeding them for much longer, 100's of years, as opposed to the 10-20 years people have been selective breeding ball pythons. Genetic flaws tend to take quite a few generations to rear their heads, and by then, it is usually much too late to do anything about it. My statement had nothing to do with comparing ball pythons to dogs, other than that they are animals that people breed.

    Robin
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1