Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 856

2 members and 854 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud

genetic geeks

Printable View

  • 09-05-2008, 12:23 PM
    Blue Apple Herps
    Re: genetic geeks
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Louie1 View Post
    I have a pretty good idea when it comes to double recessive but not on triples or quads

    Are you good with punnet squares? I think that's probably the easiest way to visualize the probable genetic make up of the offspring. For triple and quad recessive, you just keep adding them in.

    Odds for having a homozygous animal are single recessive is 1/4, double is 1/16, triple is 1/64, etc etc. For any trait its not homozygous for it has a 2/3 chance of being het for it.

    So lets say you crossed two het clown, ghost, xanthic together. There would be 1/64 chance of getting a animal homozygous for all three. There would be a 1/16 chance of getting one that was homozygous for two of the genes, and a 1/4 for getting one that was homozygous for at least one of them.

    So lets say you got a clown from that pairing. That clown would then have a 2/3 chance (or 66%) of being het for ghost OR xanthic. It would actually have a 4/9 chance of being het ghost AND xanthic.

    But if you do the punnet square, these ratios will make a lot more sense...
  • 09-05-2008, 12:24 PM
    littleindiangirl
    Re: genetic geeks
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Louie1 View Post
    I have a pretty good idea when it comes to double recessive but not on triples or quads

    Have you written out a punnet square with double?

    The same idea applies, you look at all possible outcomes for the genotypes, throw them into a square, and cross.

    http://www.newenglandreptile.com/gen...e.html#dblhet2
  • 09-05-2008, 12:35 PM
    Drew87
    Re: genetic geeks
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Freakie_frog View Post
    here wrap your brain around this

    1.56% WT
    3.12% Het. Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Axanthic,
    3.12% Het. Albinodc,
    6.25% Het. Albinodc, Het. Axanthic,
    3.12% Het. Albinodc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Albinodc,
    3.12% Homozygous Albinodc, Het. Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Albinodc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    3.12% Het. Clowndc,
    6.25% Het. Clowndc, Het. Axanthic,
    3.12% Het. Clowndc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    6.25% Het. Clowndc, Het. Albinodc,
    12.5% Het. Clowndc, Het. Albinodc, Het. Axanthic,
    6.25% Het. Clowndc, Het. Albinodc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    3.12% Het. Clowndc, Homozygous Albinodc,
    6.25% Het. Clowndc, Homozygous Albinodc, Het. Axanthic,
    3.12% Het. Clowndc, Homozygous Albinodc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Clowndc,
    3.12% Homozygous Clowndc, Het. Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Clowndc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    3.12% Homozygous Clowndc, Het. Albinodc,
    6.25% Homozygous Clowndc, Het. Albinodc, Het. Axanthic,
    3.12% Homozygous Clowndc, Het. Albinodc, Homozygous Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Clowndc, Homozygous Albinodc,
    3.12% Homozygous Clowndc, Homozygous Albinodc, Het. Axanthic,
    1.56% Homozygous Clowndc, Homozygous Albinodc, Homozygous Axanthic,


    Dude, your nuts thats hurting my head. :rolleye2::rolleye2:
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1