Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
that would be complete dom if im correct....
http://www.newenglandreptile.com/ner...ll-python.html
Nerd also states Dom along with most other breeders....
no big deal but if im wrong i would like to know as i am saying wrong info and would feel like a fool.
Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
i figured in my head super pastel is a dom trait since all babies in a normal to super pastel will be all pastel. then a pin to normal only 50% of babies will be pin then yea pin would be co-dom but i could be wrong i would say wait till for the breeders inputs. but if im wrong then i'll have learned something new.
Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
way better than the last episode... women and snakes part 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
Great work Brian I watch every week.
Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
I noticed he said spider was co-dom too when talking about the bumblebee.
Dominants do not have a proven super, co-doms have a proven super is the most basic way to break it down for me.
Or - co-doms are visible hets for their super form.
Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BHB
This weeks show we talk about some gentics of a handful of our Ball Pythons, and we put my crew to the test, do they know anything about genetics??? To watch just go to:
www.youtube.com/snakebytestv please subscribe, comment and rate the show ( it means a lot) if you want to join the shows community you can at:
www.snakebytes.tv As always we can't thank everyone enough for their support!!!! Brian(BHB)
Thanks B
that freakin was the best yet! you have a good crew!
Re: SnakeBytesTV-lessons in genetics
I think somewhere i heard that what we refer to as co-dominat is actually incomplete dominant. so in the case of the pastel 50% of the babies are pastel, which kind of shows a little of the dominant form, and the super pastel is the complete dominant form.
but in the case of the spider/pins its actually is co-dominant.
if you wiki incomplete dominance it explains it better than i can .