Illegal

Bans on harmless animals are so idiotic. I can understand that yes, ferrets do bite. Well so does that old lady's pet poodle that is kept in that multiple dwelling residence which just so happens to not be that poodle's natural enviroment. :taz:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jay_Bunny

Bans on harmless animals are so idiotic. I can understand that yes, ferrets do bite. Well so does that old lady's pet poodle that is kept in that multiple dwelling residence which just so happens to not be that poodle's natural enviroment. :taz:

---

..no need to exclude the old lady! beware the dentures!:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gooseman

..no need to exclude the old lady! beware the dentures!:D

---

:grandma:


:giggle:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gooseman

Uhh... so pretty much the only pets you SHOULD be able to keep based on "natural habitats" in NYC would be rats, mice, cockraoches, and house gnomes... :rolleyes:

---

Don't forget to include Pigeons

I was just making sure.... It is ridiculous!!!! I mean they can't do anymore damage than a dog. I work with ball pythons at my volunteer job. In fact one of the them is very special to me, her name is Suzy. Me and her are best buds. It's a shame they are illegal over here.... Thank god I'll be going of to college in a 2 years. I plan on going to the University of Pennsylvania and studying to be a vet. :D :D :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monk90222

Don't forget to include Pigeons

---

HAHAHA :8:

Maybe the ball pythons are banned because they are enveloped in a ban to all pythons? I think that would make much more sense.