Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 771

1 members and 770 guests
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,880
Threads: 249,078
Posts: 2,572,002
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, pickledratinajar
  • 12-26-2006, 08:14 PM
    Mendel's Balls
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rabernet
    I didn't realize it was that deep - I found it interesting, sorry you didn't agree.

    No need to apologize.......It was an interesting post. :)
  • 12-26-2006, 08:29 PM
    Griggs2121
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
  • 12-27-2006, 12:20 AM
    Rapture
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    One of my first threads... it was a doozie.

    http://www.ball-pythons.net/forums/s...ad.php?t=33496
  • 12-27-2006, 01:22 AM
    Emilio
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    I also really liked the possible het's thread another that come's to mind is Rapture's maternal discussion. I'll definitly think of some more I just need some time.
  • 12-27-2006, 10:42 PM
    stangs13
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    Raptures Maturnal brooding thread


    The weird morph thread

    My girl problem thread, cause it helped..lol.


    Any thread where Adam starts showing his:

    Adam Wysocki:

    Quote:
    When you see your ball python doing something and you think to yourself "self, I wonder who would know why he/she is doing that" ... I'm that guy. ;)




    -ness.:carrot:
  • 12-28-2006, 01:17 PM
    Mendel's Balls
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    Stangs,

    I have a classic thread for you, it's not from 2006....but it fits your above post so well.

    Instead of calling you flip, perhaps your nick-name should be CHiP. :)


    I did find a somewhat interesting thread started by you here. This was an interesting post, but learn to reference your work-that way people will take you more seriously. If people take you seriously every once and awhile maybe you can contribute a classic thread or two.

    So what publication and date were those pics taken from? I see a volume and number..
  • 12-28-2006, 01:18 PM
    stangs13
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    I know all about CHiP.....:carrot:



    Quote:

    You can earn your way into this rank and you can earn your way back out of it again by posting relevant original posts or responses, using your Edit button when you think of something add after you hit the Submit button, and keeping your posts in the section for that subject or purpose.
    I do that alot, but I try not to do it.

    Thats really the only thing I do, I don't try and raise my post count, I could careless what my post count is.
  • 12-28-2006, 01:29 PM
    Mendel's Balls
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    I was thinking more along these lines.....

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Marla

    If you have been give this rank, that means that the mod team has noticed a special effort on your part to drive up your post count by posting the same thing in multiple places, posting one response in multiple posts, or otherwise posting more quantity than substance.

    Anyway, redeem yourself by telling us the source of those pics.....
  • 12-28-2006, 01:30 PM
    Mendel's Balls
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    You definitely know how to use the edit button I see....just not in the most constructive way.
  • 12-28-2006, 01:32 PM
    stangs13
    Re: Classic BP.net Threads for the 2006 Year
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mendel's Balls
    I was thinking more along these lines.....



    Anyway, redeem yourself by telling us the source of those pics.....

    What pics?

    I haven't posted the same thing 2 times in 2 diffrent places. Find where I have if I have.


    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Mendel's Balls
    You definitely know how to use the edit button I see....just not in the most constructive way.

    I try.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1