Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,499

0 members and 1,499 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,936
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,284
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182

Evolution of Beauty

Printable View

  • 10-17-2006, 01:31 PM
    JLC
    Re: Evolution of Beauty
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sho220
    Dress sizes back then were 4-6 sizes smaller than today...The way clothes are "sized" is not standard or scientific and has changed greatly through the years.

    Even so...size 12 in NO WAY represents the true issues "plus size" women have to consider or endure when shopping for clothes. It's rediculous.
  • 10-17-2006, 01:35 PM
    AkivaSmith
    Re: Evolution of Beauty
    My wife is a size 20 and I find her very attractive. I can't understand my daughter who is 12 y.o. and a little under-weight -- she is always complaining that she is fat?:(
  • 10-17-2006, 01:41 PM
    sho220
    Re: Evolution of Beauty
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by JLC
    Even so...size 12 in NO WAY represents the true issues "plus size" women have to consider or endure when shopping for clothes. It's rediculous.

    Just pointing out that the sizes have changed since the Marilyn Monroe days. :)

    It's also not surprising to see a 12 being labled "plus" size. The typical model looks like a walking skeleton. It's really disturbing seeing these women paraded around as though that's how women should look...:(
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1