Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eric Alan
And amphibians too. :)
Thank you! I was typing in a hurry on my way out the door :D
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Slim
I always like to use the "Frog Pond" example. Here in north central Florida, about 5 miles west of Newberry, there's a small pond in the middle of large cattle operation and it's the only full time body of water for at least 2 square miles. The pond's been there for as long as I can remember and the thing is chock full of frogs. I couldn't even begin to guess how many generations of inbred frogs have lived and died in that pond. I was over there about three weeks ago and didn't see a single frog with 3 eyes or 5 legs.
Like Pit said, reptiles are completely different.
your logic is flawed, birds carry in frog eggs and what not. How do you think the frogs go there in the first place. Genetic diversity is always getting brought in.
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Typically, line breeding parent to offspring is preferred to sibling-sibling pairing. as it still offers genetic diversity. say 50% gene match. Vs 100%. not really exact but good enough for demonstration.
If you do sibling-sibling it would be best to then bring back in diversity with unrelated snakes with the next generation
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stretcharmy
Typically, line breeding parent to offspring is preferred to sibling-sibling pairing. as it still offers genetic diversity. say 50% gene match. Vs 100%. not really exact but good enough for demonstration.
If you do sibling-sibling it would be best to then bring back in diversity with unrelated snakes with the next generation
I agree with this for the most part if you are just breeding and want genetic diversity. However the op is asking if it's ok to breed back to the parent or sibling when breeding for a specific animal in this case albino pieds. Breeding back to the parent in this case or any case where the objective is to produce a specific mutation would be delayed or skewed. Because the sibling animal, as opposed to the parent, who is genetically more compatible in producing the desired outcome (morph).
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Can't help but think of this with each and every reply that goes further and further down the rabbit hole:
http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/42/42552...2c9d1cd1e8.jpg
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
So how do the bigger breeders do this? Or are there collection so big it is not in play? I can see more parent/sibling breeding for the hobbyist. And from what I am reading it's ok to a point?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stretcharmy
your logic is flawed, birds carry in frog eggs and what not. How do you think the frogs go there in the first place. Genetic diversity is always getting brought in.
Not sure that's enough to significantly turn over the batting order...
Re: Breeding daughters to fathers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ceh23
So how do the bigger breeders do this? Or are there collection so big it is not in play? I can see more parent/sibling breeding for the hobbyist. And from what I am reading it's ok to a point?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Take a look at how the morphs become established. If you are trying to prove out a mutation and there is only one animal to start with, regardless of how large your operation is you have to line breed.