Re: Which of these temp/humidity readers would you trust more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mephibosheth1
Are the temp guns more accurate??
I just wonder now about the accuracy of the Acurite I have....Maybe I should get a heat gun too...
@Serpent Merchant: what is the "Salt Test"??
No they aren't, at least not the cheap ones used in the hobby. Most are actually worse.
Salt Test: http://www.cigarpass.com/cigars-101/...ygrometer.html
Re: Which of these temp/humidity readers would you trust more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mephibosheth1
so you would or wouldn't recommend one??
I currently just go off my accurite probe for judging the hot spot, and assumed that the reason acurite was so widely used was due to the accuracy of its measurements...
I forgot the part in Chemistry about accuracy vs. precision :p
Temp guns are a great tool, don't get me wrong. I have one and use it all the time, but people need to realize that they aren't any more accurate than most decent digital thermometers. Most are at least +/- 4 F, that is about the same as an acu-rite. The really cheap temp guns can be even worse.
I would recommend temp guns mainly to people who use rack systems, that is really what they are best for. $ for $ temp guns just don't make a huge amount of sense unless you have a very large collection. Why pay $125 for a temperature measuring device that isn't any more accurate than a $12 unit? Why pay $40 or $50 for one that is worse than the $12 unit?
Re: Which of these temp/humidity readers would you trust more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mephibosheth1
So how can I make sure my Acurite is actually readi the right temperature??
You need something to compare it to. Something like a herpstat probe that is rated to be accurate. I know some people recommend buying 3-4 acurites and then averaging their readings. That is a bit extreme, but would work.