Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,470

0 members and 1,470 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,287
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182
  • 05-15-2013, 03:44 PM
    kitedemon
    Separate thermostats vs. dual-zone thermostat
    They can fail, everything can. I would always suggest a fail safe. The new herpstats are the only product where there might be a question. It is unlikely. I have had a herpstat quite a while ago with a bad controller. It just did not stop heating when it was supposed to. This failure would by pass the relay. So it can happen, that said the error code it produced took dion two days to find out what it was. He had never seen it before. Rare not impossiable.

    The unit that failed was a 4 zone and had a failsafe on it. It does work perfectly.

    The set up is easy, place the failsafe probe where either you have the heater capable of the hottest temps, or where failure is the most damaging.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 05-15-2013, 03:52 PM
    spitzu
    Re: Separate thermostats vs. dual-zone thermostat
    I'm paranoid of fire as well and nothing will convince me that any of these devices are 100% safe. Every single one of our thermostats has a VE-100 as a backup.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1