Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 640

2 members and 638 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,110
Posts: 2,572,154
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
  • 03-04-2013, 08:50 AM
    Royal Hijinx
    I think I always put it Sire X Dam, but never really thought about it.
  • 03-04-2013, 09:13 AM
    Pythonfriend
    Re: Quick question that been driving me nuts
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by REBELLMORPH View Post
    Coral glow het??:O

    yeah, coral glow is definitively weird. first they believed it to be dominant, then noticed that somehow they got a lot of female coral glows but failed to hit a male coral glow, then this turned into a morph issue and got listed as such. then the first male coral glows were produced. and then you got these clutches where all males looked normal and all females looked like coral glows, and then people figured it out.

    now it seems well-understood to me, and male coral glows are much more expensive than female ones. at nerd its 20000 for a male and 12000 for the one female they have. now the gene is listed as co-dominant.... that will change i think. i would call it a sex-linked recessive gene.
  • 03-04-2013, 09:18 AM
    REBELLMORPH
    Re: Quick question that been driving me nuts
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jinx667 View Post
    i think i always put it sire x dam, but never really thought about it.

    x2 ;)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1