Re: Why I think we need unproven dominant
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jinx667
Very nice. I think once we get to the .001 that should be good enough to call it homozygous.
somewhere around 16-17 eggs puts you right there.
Re: Why I think we need unproven dominant
I worked in a genetics lab. We had lethal recessive mutant genes and lethal codominant mutant genes. We had no lethal dominant genes.
Lethal recessive mutant (a), normal gene (A)
AA looks normal, lives
Aa looks normal, lives
aa dies
Lethal codominant mutant (A), normal gene (a)
AA dies
Aa does not look normal, lives
aa looks normal
Lethal dominant mutant (A), normal gene (a)
AA never produced
Aa dies
aa looks normal