Re: Best first rifle for hunting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AK907
Most standard factory hollowpoints are designed to expand rapidly and not penetrate. Basically they are cheaply made bullets with a cool name.
Cheaply made? How so? Aren't they made pretty much the same, other than the tip? I've shot a lot of different hp handgun rounds and they perform pretty much the same as round point rounds other than some feed better than others. I'm talking about handgun rounds though, and not hunting rounds. Is there a difference?
Re: Best first rifle for hunting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sho220
I'm talking about handgun rounds though, and not hunting rounds. Is there a difference?
Yes there is. Defensive handgun rounds are designed to be deployed at a fairly close range. 7 yards is the average distance for a gunfight. Hollow point rounds work very well at creating a debilitating wound channel without over penetration.
For hunting, the shot ranges are much greater, and aside from the fact that hollow points pack less kinetic punch at those distances, the actually hollow point nose of the bullet makes it a ballistic nightmare because no two rounds act the same way when traveling down range. Not a good thing for accuracy.
Re: Best first rifle for hunting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rob
You shoot alvin??? Evil! Lol
No, its Theadore, he can't run fast enough..lol
Re: Best first rifle for hunting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Slim
Yes there is. Defensive handgun rounds are designed to be deployed at a fairly close range. 7 yards is the average distance for a gunfight. Hollow point rounds work very well at creating a debilitating wound channel without over penetration.
For hunting, the shot ranges are much greater, and aside from the fact that hollow points pack less kinetic punch at those distances, the actually hollow point nose of the bullet makes it a ballistic nightmare because no two rounds act the same way when traveling down range. Not a good thing for accuracy.
Thanks for the info. I can definitely see how distance can affect performance, but I still don't understand how hp's are more "cheaply" made? All the components are basically the same, the tip of the bullet is just designed differently. How would that equate to being cheaply made?