Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 793

1 members and 792 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,177
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan

Maternal or Incubation?

Printable View

  • 03-01-2012, 04:08 PM
    Annarose15
    Re: Maternal or Incubation?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Slim View Post
    I would not want to take a chance on a Killer Clown Hypo Super King Pin Pied 100% Het for Albino being one of the ones that was naturally lost...;)

    Umm...you can borrow space in my incubator anytime! :please:
  • 03-01-2012, 11:24 PM
    Slim
    Re: Maternal or Incubation?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Annarose15 View Post
    Umm...you can borrow space in my incubator anytime! :please:

    :rofl::rofl::rofl:
  • 03-01-2012, 11:49 PM
    Mike41793
    I plan on breeding next november and will use an incubator. Ill have chances at producing some double gene animals so i wouldnt want to chance losing them. (im not saying this bc of money either, i wouldnt wanna lose any of them but especially double gene ones). Plus thats alot of stress on the mother to take care of the clutch. (Maternal incubation an take up to 70 days). Id rather have her lay the eggs then get her eating again asap!
  • 03-19-2012, 11:23 AM
    Quiet Tempest
    It goes without saying I prefer maternal over artificial. Just my preference. I've not lost an egg yet (knock on wood) and my females usually do eat while brooding so that's not been a concern.

    I'll be maternally incubating my clutches again this year if my females ever decide to lay.
  • 03-19-2012, 11:42 AM
    bsash
    Most people like to use incubators as there is a higher hatch rate and much less work than with maternal incubation.
  • 03-19-2012, 12:21 PM
    Quiet Tempest
    Re: Maternal or Incubation?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by bsash View Post
    Most people like to use incubators as there is a higher hatch rate and much less work than with maternal incubation.

    I can only speak for my own clutches but I've been doing it this way since '08 and no egg losses yet. It's easier for me to let my females do all the work because there is no setting up incubators and egg tubs. The only change is that I'm more attentive to my gravid and/or brooding females to make sure they have everything they need. Not putting down artificial means at all but both methods work and it's all a matter of personal preference. :)
  • 03-19-2012, 12:30 PM
    Annarose15
    Re: Maternal or Incubation?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Quiet Tempest View Post
    I can only speak for my own clutches but I've been doing it this way since '08 and no egg losses yet. It's easier for me to let my females do all the work because there is no setting up incubators and egg tubs. The only change is that I'm more attentive to my gravid and/or brooding females to make sure they have everything they need. Not putting down artificial means at all but both methods work and it's all a matter of personal preference. :)

    I've actually considered trying maternal incubation for a clutch out of sheer curiosity, but I think my girls are better off without me checking on them as frequently as I do my egg boxes (out of curiosity and excitement, not necessity, of course!). :)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1