Re: Update on girl killed by python
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trogdorpheus
I think they should require a license to own burms and retics and other large constrictors, that way we reduce the number of times morons get a hold of animals they can't handle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GoFride08
Supposedly the last time they had fed the snake was a month prior, when they gave it a roadkill squirrel. It's my understanding that the two adults in the house did not have any money to provide food or proper housing for their pet.
But they had the money to buy the snake from the flea market? I'm sure they had the money for beer & smokes every day! Hell my animals grocery list gets done before the people grocery list.
Re: Update on girl killed by python
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trogdorpheus
I think they should require a license to own burms and retics and other large constrictors, that way we reduce the number of times morons get a hold of animals they can't handle.
In this instance I think it would be more useful if they required a license to have children, therefore reducing the number of times morons have kids they can't take care of properly.
Re: Update on girl killed by python
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wolfy-hound
Why isn't there a push to ban dogs? They kill a lot more kids per year than giant snakes have... ever.
This!
(Even though dogs are by far my favourite animals and I would never want them to be banned, they have killed not only kids, but adults too).
Re: Update on girl killed by python
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lk_holla
In this instance I think it would be more useful if they required a license to have children, therefore reducing the number of times morons have kids they can't take care of properly.
So so so so so true
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Foschi Exotic Serpents
I had been hoping they would get charged with it because there had been previous talk of child abuse and neglect anyway. I'd read reports where people suspected one of them may have accidentally killed the little girl and put the snake on her to make it appear that the snake had done it.
Wasn't there a report that said there were no bite marks found on the girl?
If the snake had done it, there would be a mark where it struck and bit. Plus a bit of blood.
:edit:
If I remember correctly.. It was found just laying on top of her. It was not wrapped around her. It was not trying to swallow any part of her. None if it makes any sense to me.
Interesting, but in the news reports the snake had stab wounds, from where they claim to have been trying to get it from around the little girl.