Check my logic with this BEL question...

i see no reason, why there shouldnt be a super lesser mojo. i think u have the chance.

pastel lucys do exist. so why not mojo super lesser lucys...

i just dont get it...

the wizard thay the wouldnt get produced but i think they would.

when u bread a lesser to a lesser pastel, u get bel pastels. when u breed a lesser to a lesser mojo u would get super lesser mojos- or not?

just because they are on the same complex doesnt mean that they are not compatible in this way. the double lucy does exist- so why not this...

Because Mojo and Lesser are different versions of the same gene..

To have a Super Mojo Lesser would be like saying Super Cinni Black Pastel..

Lesser Mojo BEL's are for all intensive purpouses Supers since when bred to a normal they don't reproduce or produce Normals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Freakie_frog

Because Mojo and Lesser are different versions of the same gene..

To have a Super Mojo Lesser would be like saying Super Cinni Black Pastel..

Lesser Mojo BEL's are for all intensive purpouses Supers since when bred to a normal they don't reproduce or produce Normals

---

and people wonder why we get so confused:rolleye2:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 771subliminal

and people wonder why we get so confused:rolleye2:

---

...and that's why I posed the question :rofl:

Thanks all for your help in clearing this up for me!

The online "Genetics Wizard" doesn't work for different alleles on the same locus, AFAIK (unless I just haven't figured out how to do it yet :rolleyes:). If you type in "lesser" and "mojave" as the two co-dominant traits, it assumes that they're on two different loci even though they (presumably) are not, which messes up the results.

Exactly, you can't have 3 genes occupy 2 spaces. A snake can only have 2 copys of the BEL gene because they share the same locus.

A double lucy is both black eyed and blue eyed lucy. It is possible because the fire gene is on a different locus, it is not part of the "BEL complex".