Incubation temps and affect on sex and size

Yep, it sure is. I think I'm going to start recording all of that data myself. I can say, though, that I've had clutches very high in girls, and others very high in boys--incubated at the same temperature.

But if there really is a statistical trend, I think we should investigate that. We don't think temps play a role in snake gender...but what if we're wrong? Remember that, up until recently, no one knew that garter snakes were venomous. No one knew that Komodo Dragons were venomous, and they'd actually looked for that before, too.
There is a lot still to be learned, even about animals we THOUGHT we knew.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion

no one knew that garter snakes were venomous. No one knew that Komodo Dragons were venomous, and they'd actually looked for that before, too.
There is a lot still to be learned, even about animals we THOUGHT we knew.

---

yea going off track here but... huh? this is news to me? got more info on it?

Garters are venomous colubrids--they don't have rear fangs, but they still produce venom in their saliva. You would have to get chewed on for 45 minutes to get a venom reaction (someone actually did this...lol).
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/05/science/05veno.html

Komodo monitor venom was just discovered this past year.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...gon-venom.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion

Yep, it sure is. I think I'm going to start recording all of that data myself. I can say, though, that I've had clutches very high in girls, and others very high in boys--incubated at the same temperature.

But if there really is a statistical trend, I think we should investigate that. We don't think temps play a role in snake gender...but what if we're wrong? Remember that, up until recently, no one knew that garter snakes were venomous. No one knew that Komodo Dragons were venomous, and they'd actually looked for that before, too.
There is a lot still to be learned, even about animals we THOUGHT we knew.

---

Agreed--I have as well. For me, it seems to be more dependent on which female laid the clutch; of course, so far I've only got 2 breedable females. Hopefully in the years to come, I can see if this is also true with more females. Of course, I'm sure there's some females out there who laid a 50/50 split too. ;)

A ton of great info, thanks for sharing.

One thing though, not too many have noted the weight of the eggs when they were laid vs hatchling weight.

Anyone, anyone.....:cool::rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hyper Joe

A ton of great info, thanks for sharing.

One thing though, not too many have noted the weight of the eggs when they were laid vs hatchling weight.

Anyone, anyone.....:cool::rolleyes:

---

yeah i think if you have 90 grAM egg it would probably weight less when it hatched out because when you weigh it with the egg with the shell thats more matter there than when it hatches out ..someone correct me if im wrong..:rolleye2:

Great post Joe. I am a numbers guy, and record copious amounts of data. However, I have never accumulated in one place the egg weight versus the hatchling weight. I do have it, but I trust that your theory makes sense in my mind. Lower temps allow the animals to absorb yolk a bit longer. As a cutter of eggs, I believe that temp has little to do with it, because I "prompt" them out a bit early, and this may be why I see some dropped yolks. With that said, I produce a considerable amount more eggs than you documented, and it may just be that I am seeing more unabsorbed yolks, due to the larger sampling size.

As far as your sex thing, I will have to agree with Brad, in that sex determination in Ball Pythons I belive is chromosome dependent. Two years ago, I produced a very male heavy season, and last year, I was very female heavy. Both years, the incubator was within 1 degree of incubating temps.

Great work, and keep up the studying. It is always fascinating to look at numbers, and see if there are any pieces of the puzzle that we have been missing.