Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 705

2 members and 703 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,915
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,196
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KBFalconer

NORMAL X Bumble Bee

Printable View

  • 06-20-2008, 01:28 AM
    nick_chow
    NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    Hi,

    I want to ask that why NORMAL X Bumble Bee the result is
    25% normal, 25% pastel, 25% spider and 25% Bumble Bee?
    not 50% spider and 50% bumble bee???

    Thx!
  • 06-20-2008, 01:43 AM
    Argentra
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    It would be 50/50 if you bred a SPIDER to a Bee. Normals do not carry any of the genes that make a Bee, but Bees have two sets of genes that make them what they are. The normal cuts down on the chances of those genes getting expressed, hence the 25%s.

    At least I think that's right... it's nearly Midnight and the science part of my brain is already asleep. :D
  • 06-20-2008, 03:42 AM
    771subliminal
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    you wouldnt actually get bees would you breeding to a normal?

    shouldnt it be normals, spiders, and pastels?

    but like its been said its 4am and im not to crisp
  • 06-20-2008, 08:07 AM
    munding
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by 771subliminal View Post
    you wouldnt actually get bees would you breeding to a normal?

    shouldnt it be normals, spiders, and pastels?

    but like its been said its 4am and im not to crisp

    that's what i thought too but somebody hatched out a bee with a bee x normal breeding in another forum.
  • 06-20-2008, 09:09 AM
    FIREball
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    Original poster is right

    1/4 Bees
    1/4 Spiders
    1/4 Pastels
    1/4 Normals


    This holds true with any double codom except supers with all the babies being the original morph...for example super pastel to normal would be all pastels
  • 06-20-2008, 09:25 AM
    Seneschal
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    The reason is this: there aren't just two alleles controling the physical appearance of the animal.

    Let's say each parent can now contribute two genes: Normal will always contribute normal, but Bumblebee will contribute any one of these:

    SpiderNormal PastelNormal NormalNormal SpiderPastel
    to the genes of the normal, and as such each of the resulting children will get "NormalNormal" from mom, and any of the four others from dad. But because dad has one normal allele to match each pastel or spider allele, he still contributes two, just that the spider, or pastel, or 'bumblebee' ones show up.


    So, the resulting children:


    ------- Spidernormal ---- Pastelnormal ---- NN ---- SpiderPastel

    NN ------SpNNN-----------PNNN-------------NNNN----------SpPNN

    NN ------SpNNN-----------PNNN-------------NNNN----------SpPNN

    NN ------SpNNN-----------PNNN-------------NNNN----------SpPNN

    NN ------SpNNN-----------PNNN-------------NNNN----------SpPNN



    Does that make any sense?
  • 06-20-2008, 11:01 AM
    RandyRemington
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    The main point to remember is that the spider and pastel mutations are at two different gene locations. There is not just one normal gene of importance here, there is a normal version of the gene at the spider location and there is also a normal version of the gene at the pastel location.

    The bumblebee parent gives one copy of each gene. For the spider gene there is a 50/50 chance it will give the spider mutant version rather than the normal for spider version. There is a completely separate roll of the dice for the pastel gene with another 50/50 chance of giving either the pastel mutant version or the normal for pastel version. The combined effect gives you the 25% split of chances:

    normal for pastel + normal for spider = normal baby
    pastel mutant + normal for spider = pastel baby
    normal for pastel + spider mutant = spider baby
    pastel mutant + spider mutant = bumblebee baby
  • 06-21-2008, 07:13 AM
    apocolypse
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    Wow, i'm new here and i think that the way you broke the diagram down is a great asset to newer breeders like myself.
  • 06-21-2008, 07:17 AM
    apocolypse
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    So this would also apply to the pewter i'm purchasing then.
    So now I do not need to focus on putting a cinny with a pastel. Am I correct?
  • 06-21-2008, 08:44 AM
    RandyRemington
    Re: NORMAL X Bumble Bee
    Correct, pewter has both cinnamon and regular pastel and they are separate genes so pewter X normal produces eggs with the following possible genetics:

    25% chance normal
    25% chance pastel
    25% chance cinnamon
    25% chance pewter

    Now when you start getting into different mutations of the same gene like say a leucistic produced by lesser bred to mojave the rules change. This is because the two mutations combined are different mutations of the same gene. The result is that the luecistic gives each baby one or the other but can't give both. So one of these cross line lecistics (and I believe this would include platy and possibly crystal) bred to a normal would produce eggs with the following possible genetics:

    50% chance leucistic side grandfather (lesser in our example)
    50% chance leucistic side grandmother (mojave in our example)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1