Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 716

0 members and 716 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
  • 12-02-2007, 11:16 PM
    Patrick Long
    Creating New Genes, or Enhancing Underlieng Genes
    So I was thinking, dont be scared, all these new morphs that do not really occur in nature are genes the snake already has? correct? So when the breeders refine, refine, and refine, untill they get something crazy, like lucys, are they taking the genes that are there, but very underlieing? I dont know if im even making sense, but if we cross and cross genes, are we technically making new genes that get passed on? Or are the genes that are they just coming out in full force?
  • 12-02-2007, 11:42 PM
    JLC
    Re: Creating New Genes, or Enhancing Underlieng Genes
    It's just combining genes that are already there in new ways...as well as giving genes a chance to be expressed that don't normally get a chance with random, wild selection.
  • 12-02-2007, 11:49 PM
    Shelby
    Re: Creating New Genes, or Enhancing Underlieng Genes
    All most morphs are is a mutation. Mutations don't create new genes, they corrupt an old one (mutations are copying mistakes in DNA)
  • 12-03-2007, 12:02 AM
    wolfy-hound
    Re: Creating New Genes, or Enhancing Underlieng Genes
    If the gene is there, it might get expressed in the wild, but the snake wouldn't survive long.
    A all white snake wouldn't be able to hunt well, nor would it be much else than a easy target. But if one hatches from a egg in a CH facility, it would be snapped up fast.
    We just keep the ones that express that gene, or those related to it.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1