Ethical question

Ok, a post on fauna got me thinking (and boy do I remember now why I don't frequent fauna anymore!)...
Person A buys what is supposed to be a 100% het, turns around and later sells to Person B as 100% het. Person A then finds out some months/yr later that it is most likely not a het. How should person A handle the situation? How would you handle the situation?

I'd contact person B, explain to them the situation, and offer a refund, or exchange.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AndrewH

I'd contact person B, explain to them the situation, and offer a refund, or exchange.

---

I agree then person A gets refund from the breeder ;)

I'd just get banned! But I do think person A was being dealt the wrong hand before and after the deal..

Lord have mercy that thread involves TSE and his worthless wannabe hets :mad:.This can only get ugly ;).

But what if there is no way person A will get a refund from the original breeder? Do you still refund?

Can this active thread be posted here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JASBALLS

Can this active thread be posted here?

---

I am sure its something everyone prefers to view on fauna ;).We had enough of the TSE crap back then :P

LOL Jas, it was you who got me thinking all this. I am sure people can find the OP thread if they go looking, and I am sure I won't be posting to it there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by catawhat75

LOL Jas, it was you who got me thinking all this. I am sure people can find the OP thread if they go looking, and I am sure I won't be posting to it there.

---

What did I do?? LOL!!