Re: Spider Dominant Question
So far as I know...all spiders could be (should be?) considered "hets"...meaning that if you breed them to a normal, you'll likely get a clutch that includes both normals and spiders. To the best of my knowledge, there has yet to be proven a "super" spider.
Certainly, no visible super spider has been revealed by anyone. But you'd expect that a true homozygous spider morph would throw 100% spiders when bred to a normal. I think a couple people have what MAY be homozygous animals, but no one is certain yet, that I'm aware of.
Re: Spider Dominant Question
i see.. the only difference between dominants and co-dominants is that the het form of a dominant appears to look like its homozygous form, correct?
Re: Spider Dominant Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaLLPAddICT
i see.. the only difference between dominants and co-dominants is that the het form of a dominant appears to look like its homozygous form, correct?
Dominant and Co-dominant both only require one copy of the gene to be present for the trait to show (unlike recessive, which requires 2 copies of the gene). The difference is that when is two copies of the dominant gene, it looks the same as if there was only one, but with co-dominant if there its two copies of the gene, it looks different than if there is only one.
Re: Spider Dominant Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaLLPAddICT
i see.. the only difference between dominants and co-dominants is that the het form of a dominant appears to look like its homozygous form, correct?
I believe so.
Re: Spider Dominant Question
Re: Spider Dominant Question
Spiders dont have a super that only applies to codominat and incoplete dominate Homo and het look identical and essentially it really doesnt matter. all it would really do is allow you to produce a couple more spiders and i cant think of a test cross to prove it out