Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 737

1 members and 736 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,102
Posts: 2,572,091
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
  • 12-02-2020, 06:16 PM
    widget
    Dimming vs pulse proportional thermostat
    Just wondering which is better for a heat panel. The thermostat (herpstat) has both modes. I tried researching it but some sources say dimming is good for all heat sources while others say it shouldn’t be used for mats, panels, etc. I know on/off thermostats can cause any heat source to break quicker overtime due to constantly flipping on and off. But I thought pulse proportional was basically on/off but flicking on and off much quicker, meaning it might run the same risk? And any clue why some people would say dimming thermostats are actually bad for heat panels?
  • 12-02-2020, 07:07 PM
    jmcrook
    Re: Dimming vs pulse proportional thermostat
    I've had my herpstats running my RHPs on dimming mode for ~5yrs without issue. I believe they mention somewhere in the owner's manual that the pulse proportional setting helps to minimize an audible hum created when using heat tape in certain rack systems or something? I don't know but dimming proportional setting has caused no issues over several years with any of my panels.
  • 12-05-2020, 03:52 AM
    Mr. Misha
    Re: Dimming vs pulse proportional thermostat
    Im in the dimming camp as well using it on the heat panels successfully for 7+ years with no issues at all.

    Can't imagine why dimming would be bad for the panels as the thermostat is just decreasing and increasing the power to the panel.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
  • 12-05-2020, 07:33 AM
    GoingPostal
    Mine are also running on dimming on HPs, no issues.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1