If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first giant?
Hello all once again!
***title is supposed to say "Burm"
It's been years since I've been on here and I would appreciate some honest advice. I'm looking at either getting a male albino burm or a male tiger dwarf retic. Which would you start with? I'm not a complete stranger to large constrictors as I've had some true red tail females in the past, this however would be my first giant. I know this may start a theoretical war on here, but I would appreciate the advice. Are retics practically unhandleable at larger sizes when working alone?...due to speed?
Thanks, Kevin
Re: If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first gi
Thanks for the response! Man the hypos are beautiful too! Now, you've put me in a predicament with paint jobs!
Re: If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first gi
So in summary are you taking a gamble on size due to percentage of dwarf? That was really my only qualm about Retics. Do they have any guidelines that say within reasonable accuracy what you can expect size wise based on dwarf percentage?
I know what I'm getting myself into as far as a large constrictor, but the requirements on anything I would say that can hit 12+ feet would be a bit much (I basically base that only on a 9ft female Suriname I had years ago, but still, I know she didn'the have the energy of a retic)....at the same time I do want an animal that will get to a considerable size.
Thanks for the response
Re: If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first gi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tinyballs
So in summary are you taking a gamble on size due to percentage of dwarf? That was really my only qualm about Retics. Do they have any guidelines that say within reasonable accuracy what you can expect size wise based on dwarf percentage?
I know what I'm getting myself into as far as a large constrictor, but the requirements on anything I would say that can hit 12+ feet would be a bit much (I basically base that only on a 9ft female Suriname I had years ago, but still, I know she didn'the have the energy of a retic)....at the same time I do want an animal that will get to a considerable size.
Thanks for the response
It is kind of a gamble as you have no real definite answer to how large a mix of SD/D will get. Feeding will play into it but some retics are more food driven and will push and destroy their face if not kept happy. Caesar is an example of that. I tried to go 2 week with him and he pushed in half his face, split his lip, scuffed his chin and messed up a couple belly scales. It all healed fine when i kept him fed for a couple weeks but he has to be fed every 10 days or so or he pushes.
Also i have been told certain genes will make bigger animals generally. Tiger gene is one of them.
And then of course it also depends on how much of what gene the animal takes. Take for example Gio's retic, he is more dwarf then mine and less mainland by a considerable amount and is fed a lot less yet his male is only about 1 foot smaller than mine who was fed on the heavier side. Then you look at JMs ultra ivory male who about 18 months old and 3'.
You can get an idea though as super dwarfs generally stay under 10'. Dwarfs around 14' and mainlands around 18'. But again there is no certainty.
If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first giant?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sauzo
It is kind of a gamble as you have no real definite answer to how large a mix of SD/D will get. Feeding will play into it but some retics are more food driven and will push and destroy their face if not kept happy. Caesar is an example of that. I tried to go 2 week with him and he pushed in half his face, split his lip, scuffed his chin and messed up a couple belly scales. It all healed fine when i kept him fed for a couple weeks but he has to be fed every 10 days or so or he pushes.
Also i have been told certain genes will make bigger animals generally. Tiger gene is one of them.
And then of course it also depends on how much of what gene the animal takes. Take for example Gio's retic, he is more dwarf then mine and less mainland by a considerable amount and is fed a lot less yet his male is only about 1 foot smaller than mine who was fed on the heavier side. Then you look at JMs ultra ivory male who about 18 months old and 3'.
You can get an idea though as super dwarfs generally stay under 10'. Dwarfs around 14' and mainlands around 18'. But again there is no certainty.
Good info here, though Gerald is more like 5' or a tad more and is 50% SD and 50% mainland from Thailand. But yeah, he's tiny. Dad was 6' ultra anery, mom was 11' platinum/fire het anery bred my Bob Clark.
My vote would be for a very high % SD. My 100% SD kalatoa girl Phyllis is a solid 8' at 18.5 months and is a handful at times. You'd better be on your toes around feeding time with her or you could wind up in trouble. She also requires a LOT of food or destroys her face like Caesar. They are very smart and curious snakes though and I love them. Also worth noting... expect to clean a LOT of pee! They drink copious amounts of water and expel it in similar quantities.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first gi
It’s also also worth a mention that dwarf retics are generally not as docile as the mainlands, they tend to be quite flighty. When my brother bred retics the mainlands that we’re handled were much more docile than any dwarf species and even when tamed every now and then a dwarf would tag you. I’m sure there are exceptions but worth mentioning, good luck on choice!
Re: If you had the choice ...would you go with a dwarf Retic or a Buras your first gi
I want both. LOL
Sent from my SM-N910H using Tapatalk