Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Lesser)
I have a male and female BEL, both super lesser. Is there any reason why I shouldn't breed them together to get 100% BEL?
Thanks for your reply!
Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les
The only issue is the risk of 'bug eye' but you run that risk any time you make a super lesser no matter how you make it.
Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Oxylepy
Yeah, go ahead and breed them if you're okay to deal with the offspring. Honestly, though, I'd say it's a pretty boring breeding program. If you can get a couple other supers in your BELs (Super Pastel, Super Cinnamon/Black Pastel, etc) you have a really really strong breeder snake, because all offspring will at least be het for each trait.
Super pastel , cinnamon and black pastels can't be hets unless they are from some kind of recessive gene
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Is there any reason why I don't see BEL x BEL breeding? (Super Lesser x Super Les
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jkerezsi
Super pastel , cinnamon and black pastels can't be hets unless they are from some kind of recessive gene
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The het ( short for heterozygous) is implied when we say pastel, cinny, black pastel ect. They are however all hets.